Cited by 670Adolescent Health and BehaviorsBullying, Victimization, and AggressionAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse

Santor, Darcy A., Messervey, Deanna, Kusumakar, Vivek·2000·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005152515264

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santor, D. A., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2000-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
163-182
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W1807766024
Cited by
670
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
peer pressure, peer conformity, popularity, adolescents, risk-taking, academic performance, sexual attitudes, substance abuse, screening measures, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review