Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining the Black–White Achievement Gap Among Low-Income Children Using the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development

Burchinal, Margaret, McCartney, Kathleen, Steinberg, Laurence, Crosnoe, Robert, Friedman, Sarah L, McLoyd, Vonnie, Pianta, Robert, NICHD Early Child Care Research Network·2011·Child Development

Abstract

The Black–White achievement gap in children’s reading and mathematics school performance from 4½ years of age through fifth grade was examined in a sample of 314 lower income American youth followed from birth. Differences in family, child care, and schooling experiences largely explained Black–White differences in achievement, and instructional quality was a stronger predictor for Black than White children. In addition, the achievement gap was detected as young as 3 years of age. Taken together, the findings suggest that reducing the Black–White achievement gap may require early intervention to reduce race gaps in home and school experiences during the infant and toddler years as well as during the preschool and school years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01620.x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Administration for Children and Families, 2002, Making a difference in the lives of children and families: The impacts of Early Head Start programs on infants and toddlers and their families
  2. Barnett, 2008, The state of preschool 2008
  3. Caldwell, 1984, Administration manual: Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment
  4. Carneiro, 2002, Human capital policy
  5. Duncan, 2000, Selection and attrition in the NICHD childcare study’s analyses of the impacts of childcare quality on child outcomes
  6. McGrew, 1991, Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery–Revised technical manual
  7. Reardon, 2003, Sources of inequality: The growth of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic test score gaps in kindergarten and first grade
  8. Reynell, 1991, Reynell Developmental Language Scales (U.S. Edition)
  9. Rouse, 2005, The Future of Children
  10. Yazejian, 2009, Promising early returns: Educare implementation study data, March 2009

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Steinberg, L., Crosnoe, R., Friedman, S. L., McLoyd, V., Pianta, R., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network
Venue
Child Development
Published
2011-09-01
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
1404-1420
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1937736459
Cited by
267
References
53
FWCI
70.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the Black–White Achievement Gap Among Low-Income Children Using the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01620.x
The paper
Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Steinberg, L., Crosnoe, R., Friedman, S. L., McLoyd, V., Pianta, R., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2011). Examining the Black–White Achievement Gap Among Low-Income Children Using the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01620.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.