Cited by 2,360Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCritical Race Theory in Education

An Integrative Model for the Study of Developmental Competencies in Minority Children

Coll, Cynthia Garcia, Lamberty, Gontran, Jenkins, Renee, McAdoo, Harriet Pipes, Crnic, Keith, Wasik, Barbara Hanna, Garcia, Heidie Vazquez·1996·Child Development

Abstract

In this article a conceptual model for the study of child development in minority populations in the United States is proposed. In support of the proposed model, this article includes (a) a delineation and critical analysis of mainstream theoretical frameworks in relation to their attention and applicability to the understanding of developmental processes in children of color and of issues at the intersection of social class, culture, ethnicity, and race, and (b) a description and evaluation of the conceptual frameworks that have guided the extant literature on minority children and families. Based on the above considerations, an integrative conceptual model of child development is presented, anchored within social stratification theory, emphasizing the importance of racism, prejudice, discrimination, oppression, and segregation on the development of minority children and families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1131600

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous theoretical models put forth over the past decades have offered foundations for studying resistance to oppression among BIPOC youth, highlighting the ways in which this developmental construct can be adaptive and protective, and is incorporated into one's identity.

    “Numerous theoretical models put forth over the past decades (Diemer et al., 2017; Garcia‐Coll et al., 1996; Spencer, 2006) have offered foundations for studying resistance to oppression among BIPOC youth, highlighting the ways in which this developmental construct can be adaptive and protective, and is incorporated into one’s identity.”

    From Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context (2022) · cites this paper as Garcia‐Coll et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coll, C. G., Lamberty, G., Jenkins, R., McAdoo, H. P., Crnic, K., Wasik, B. H., & Garcia, H. V.
Venue
Child Development
Published
1996-10
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
1891
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153228152
Cited by
2,360
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 134 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 131
FWCI
56.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (MCU 117007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
minority children, children of color, integrative conceptual model, social stratification theory, racism, prejudice, discrimination, oppression, segregation, social class, ethnicity, race, developmental competence, families of color
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Family, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Minority Groups, Personality Development, Prejudice, Social Class

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review