The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role Models for Radical Innovations in Times of Open Innovation
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we study the influence of innovator roles in highly innovative ventures. In order to obtain a differentiated picture we take into account the degree of innovativeness as a moderating variable. To test our hypotheses we use a sample of 146 highly innovative new product development projects. We choose a rigorous sampling design and apply state‐of‐the‐art measures for the degree of innovativeness. Furthermore, we apply multi‐trait‐multi‐method methodology (MTMM) to enhance the validity of our study. The results show that innovator roles have a strong influence on innovation success but these influences are positively and negatively moderated by innovativeness. The moderating influences depend on the type of innovativeness. Remarkably, with increasing technological innovativeness innovator roles which create inter‐organizational links with the outside world appear to be more important than intra‐organizational linker roles, and support from high‐ranked organizational members turns out to have a significant negative effect on project success with higher degrees of technological innovativeness. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed and consequences for innovation research and innovation management are shown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470
Boundary spanning roles and organization structure
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257905 · Cited by 1,518
SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II
Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. (1974) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(74)90010-9 · Cited by 717
Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation
Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.403738 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2010) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00589.x · Cited by 377
Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm
Rohrbeck, R., & Gemünden, H. G. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.019 · Cited by 321
Self-citationBehavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success
Beringer, C., Jonas, D., & Kock, A. (2013) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.006 · Cited by 271
Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs
Nyström, A.-G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Kortelainen, M. (2014) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.016 · Cited by 254
Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation
Spieth, P., & Schneider, S. (2016) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-015-0794-0 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölzle, K.
- Venue
- Creativity and Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-26
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 408-421
- ISSN
- 0963-1690 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8691
- OpenAlex
- W2153975038
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role Models for Radical Innovations in Times of Open Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00451.x
- The paper
- Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölzle, K. (2007). Role Models for Radical Innovations in Times of Open Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00451.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.