Cited by 232Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and InnovationService and Product Innovation

Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation

Spieth, Patrick, Schneider, Sabrina·2016·Journal of Business Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11573-015-0794-0

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spieth, P., & Schneider, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • EBS University of Business and Law (DE)
Corresponding author
Spieth, Patrick
Venue
Journal of Business Economics
Published
2015-11-27
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
671-696
ISSN
  • 0044-2372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-8928
OpenAlex
W2201618547
Cited by
232
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
23.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
business model innovation, measurement index, business model dimensions, value proposition, value creation architecture, product innovation, German companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review