Cited by 76Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and Values

“My Group Is Not Worthy of Me”: Narcissism and Ethnocentrism

Bizumic, Boris, Duckitt, John·2008·Political Psychology

Abstract

Ethnocentrism can be seen as an expression of narcissism at the group level. However, the relationship between ethnocentrism and narcissism has rarely been studied, and there is little agreement about what this relationship might be. Both have also been treated as simple, unidimensional constructs, whereas research indicates they are better viewed as complex and multidimensional. New research using multidimensional measures of both constructs was therefore conducted in a sample of 264 undergraduates. Narcissism, primarily its covert form, related positively to intergroup expressions of ethnocentrism, but negatively to intragroup expressions. In addition, both intergroup expressions of ethnocentrism and covert narcissism were related to disliking others. The findings suggest that intergroup expressions of ethnocentrism are based on personal self‐aggrandizement, whereas intragroup expressions are based on personal self‐transcendence. In addition, they suggest that narcissistic people have generally selfish and exploitative attitudes, even towards their own groups. They also emphasize the importance of investigating both ethnocentrism and narcissism as complex multidimensional constructs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00638.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike individual narcissists, collective narcissists cannot distance themselves from their ingroup when it is found to be at fault in previous transgression.

    “Unlike individual narcissists (Bizumic & Duckitt, 2008), collective narcissists cannot distance themselves from their ingroup when it is found to be at fault in previous transgression.”
  • Grandiose narcissists are likely to leave the ingroup as soon as they can no longer use it to self-aggrandize.

    “Although it is entirely possible that grandiose narcissists identify with social groups and remain their loyal members, as long as they can bask in the ingroups' glory, it is also likely that they leave the ingroup as soon as they can no longer use it to self-aggrandize (Bizumic & Duckitt, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bizumic, B., & Duckitt, J.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
437-453
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W2145047698
Cited by
76
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Tertiary Education Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
ethnocentrism, narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, self-aggrandizement, self-transcendence, intergroup attitudes, group identity, multidimensional construct

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review