Cited by 1,107Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Two faces of narcissism.

Wink, Paul·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The present study examines the lack of strong correlations among existing self-report measures of narcissism. A principal-components analysis of 6 MMPI narcissism scales resulted in 2 orthogonal factors, 1 implying Vulnerability-Sensitivity and the other Grandiosity-Exhibitionism. Although unrelated to each other, these 2 factors were associated with such core features of narcissism as conceit, self-indulgence, and disregard of others. Despite this common core, however, Vulnerability-Sensitivity was associated with introversion, defensiveness, anxiety, and vulnerability to life's traumas, whereas Grandiosity-Exhibitionism was related to extraversion, self-assurance, exhibitionism, and aggression. Three alternative interpretations of these results are considered, and an argument for the distinction between covert and overt narcissism is made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two most commonly recognized presentations of narcissism are grandiose and vulnerable narcissism.

    “Next, we suggest two specifiers that would allow one to document whether the narcissistic individuals fall in either or potentially both of the two most commonly recognized presentations-grandiose or vulnerable narcissism (e.g., Cain et al. 2008, Miller et al. 2011, Wink 1991).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Wink 1991

  • Pathological narcissism is multifaceted, with existing empirical literature consistently highlighting the existence of both grandiose and vulnerable phenotypes.

    “It is also multifaceted in nature, with existing empirical literature consistently highlighting the existence of both grandiose and vulnerable phenotypes [28, 67, 84].”
  • Grandiose narcissism is typically characterized by attention seeking, arrogance, and self-enhancing and exaggerated self-worth, and individuals with grandiose narcissism are interpersonally domineering, antagonistic, and vindictive.

    “Grandiose narcissism is typically characterized by attention seeking, arrogance, and self-enhancing and exaggerated self-worth. These individuals have been found to be interpersonally domineering, antagonistic and vindictive [14, 74, 75, 84].”
  • Early emphasis on the grandiose presentation gave way to recognition of two types of narcissism: grandiose and vulnerable.

    “Early emphasis on the grandiose presentation gave way to recognition of two types of narcissism: grandiose and vulnerable (15, 16).”
  • Vulnerable narcissism correlates highly with introversion.

    “Grandiose narcissism displays substantial correlation with extraversion, while vulnerable narcissism correlates highly with introversion.”

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wink, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Wink, Paul
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1991
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
590-597
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4243801562
Cited by
1,107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 37
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
narcissism, self-enhancement, self-promotion, self-concept
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, MMPI, Narcissism, Personality Disorders, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Social Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review