The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cross-Category Effect: Mere Social Categorization Is Sufficient to Elicit an Own-Group Bias in Face Recognition
Abstract
Although the cross-race effect (CRE) is a well-established phenomenon, both perceptual-expertise and social-categorization models have been proposed to explain the effect. The two studies reported here investigated the extent to which categorizing other people as in-group versus out-group members is sufficient to elicit a pattern of face recognition analogous to that of the CRE, even when perceptual expertise with the stimuli is held constant. In Study 1, targets were categorized as members of real-life in-groups and out-groups (based on university affiliation), whereas in Study 2, targets were categorized into experimentally created minimal groups. In both studies, recognition performance was better for targets categorized as in-group members, despite the fact that perceptual expertise was equivalent for in-group and out-group faces. These results suggest that social-cognitive mechanisms of in-group and out-group categorization are sufficient to elicit performance differences for in-group and out-group face recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories.
Sporer, S. L. (2001) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.36 · Cited by 545
Cited by
The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review
Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025750 · Cited by 346
Ratner, K. G., Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H. J., van Knippenberg, A., & Amodio, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036498 · Cited by 144
Perceiving the World Through Group-Colored Glasses: A Perceptual Model of Intergroup Relations
Xiao, Y. J., Coppin, G., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2016) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2016.1199221 · Cited by 121
Intergroup Discrimination: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?
Brewer, M. B. (2016) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice · doi:10.1017/9781316161579.005 · Cited by 104
The cognitive and neural development of face recognition in humans
McKone, E., Crookes, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2009) · The Cognitive Neurosciences · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0042 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 706-712
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2034613565
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cross-Category Effect: Mere Social Categorization Is Sufficient to Elicit an Own-Group Bias in Face Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
- The paper
- Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). The Cross-Category Effect: Mere Social Categorization Is Sufficient to Elicit an Own-Group Bias in Face Recognition. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.