Cited by 183Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Do Today's Young People Really Think They Are So Extraordinary?: An Examination of Secular Trends in Narcissism and Self-Enhancement

Trzesniewski, Kali H., Donnellan, M. Brent, Robins, Richard W.·2008·Psychological Science

Abstract

The present research investigated secular trends in narcissism and self-enhancement over the past three decades. Despite recent claims about the impact of the "self-esteem movement" on the current generation of young people, we found no evidence that college students' scores on the Narcissistic Personality Inventory increased from the 1980s through 2007 (N= 26,867), although we did find small changes in specific facets of narcissism. Similarly, we found no evidence that high school students' level of self-enhancement, defined by the discrepancy between their perceived intelligence and their actual academic achievements, increased from 1976 to 2006 (N= 410,527). These results cast doubt on the belief that today's young people have increasingly inflated impressions of themselves compared with previous generations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02065.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From young adulthood onward, narcissism tends to decline gradually.

    “Cross-sectional evidence suggests that from young adulthood onward, narcissism tends to decline gradually (Foster, Campbell, & Twenge, 2003; Klimstra et al., 2018; Trzesniewski, Donnellan, & Robins, 2008).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Trzesniewski, Donnellan, & Robins, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Trzesniewski, Kali H.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2008-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
181-188
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2154288602
Cited by
183
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
narcissism, self-enhancement, secular trends, university students, high school students, Narcissistic Personality Inventory, perceived intelligence, academic performance, generational differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Narcissism, Personality Inventory, Schools, Self Concept, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review