Cited by 749Generational Differences and TrendsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace

Twenge, Jean M., Campbell, Stacy M.·2008·Journal of Managerial Psychology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review data from 1.4 million people who completed personality, attitude, psychopathology, or behavior scales between the 1930s and the present and to discuss how those differences may impact today's workplace. Design/methodology/approach: The data are gathered from research reports using psychological scales over the last eight decades, primarily those using college student samples. Findings: Generation Me (sometimes called Gen Y or Millennials) demonstrates higher self‐esteem, narcissism, anxiety, and depression; lower need for social approval; more external locus of control; and women with more agentic traits. Practical implications: Managers should expect to see more employees with unrealistically high expectations, a high need for praise, difficulty with criticism, an increase in creativity demands, job‐hopping, ethics scandals, casual dress, and shifting workplace norms for women. Organizations can respond to these changes with accommodations (e.g. praise programs) or with counter pressure (e.g. dress codes), and it is imperative that managers consider the best reaction for their workforce. Originality/value: Most studies of generations interview workers at one time; thus any differences could be due to age or generation. Many of these reports are also based on subjective opinions and perceptions. In contrast, the paper reviews quantitative data on generational differences controlling for age. This empirically based look at generations in the workplace should be useful to managers and workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02683940810904367

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Kennesaw State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-11-07
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
862-877
ISSN
0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977145447
Cited by
749
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 37
FWCI
52.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Managerial Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
generational differences, Generation Me, millennials, personality traits, narcissism, self-esteem, locus of control, need for approval, agentic traits, anxiety and depression, workplace management, job hopping, workplace dress code, gender norms in the workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review