The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Briefest of Glances: The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding
Open accessAbstract
What information is available from a brief glance at a novel scene? Although previous efforts to answer this question have focused on scene categorization or object detection, real-world scenes contain a wealth of information whose perceptual availability has yet to be explored. We compared image exposure thresholds in several tasks involving basic-level categorization or global-property classification. All thresholds were remarkably short: Observers achieved 75%-correct performance with presentations ranging from 19 to 67 ms, reaching maximum performance at about 100 ms. Global-property categorization was performed with significantly less presentation time than basic-level categorization, which suggests that there exists a time during early visual processing when a scene may be classified as, for example, a large space or navigable, but not yet as a mountain or lake. Comparing the relative availability of visual information reveals bottlenecks in the accumulation of meaning. Understanding these bottlenecks provides critical insight into the computations underlying rapid visual understanding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception
Navon, D. (1977) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3 · Cited by 4,005
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538
A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients
Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1026553619983 · Cited by 1,806
From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition
Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1994) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x · Cited by 715
Self-citationPerception of Objects in Natural Scenes: Is It Really Attention Free?
Evans, K. K., & Treisman, A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1476 · Cited by 281
The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation
Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2005) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.004 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Pessoa, L., & Adolphs, R. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2920 · Cited by 1,794
Five factors that guide attention in visual search
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0058 · Cited by 875
Guided Search 6.0: an updated model of visual search
Wolfe, J. M. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9 · Cited by 703
GREENE, M., & OLIVA, A. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.001 · Cited by 467
Self-citationYao, Y., Liang, Z., Yuan, Z., Liu, P., Bie, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, R., Wang, J., & Guan, Q. (2019) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2019.1643024 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 464-472
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2108489623
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Briefest of Glances: The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02316.x
- The paper
- Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009). The Briefest of Glances: The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02316.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.