Cited by 236Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation

Open access
Bacon-Macé, Nadège, Macé, Marc J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, Michèle, Thorpe, Simon J.·2005·Vision Research

Abstract

Human observers are very good at deciding whether briefly flashed novel images contain an animal and previous work has shown that the underlying visual processing can be performed in under 150 ms. Here we used a masking paradigm to determine how information accumulates over time during such high-level categorisation tasks. As the delay between test image and mask is increased, both behavioural accuracy and differential ERP amplitude rapidly increase to reach asymptotic levels around 40-60 ms. Such results imply that processing at each stage in the visual system is remarkably rapid, with information accumulating almost continuously following the onset of activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.004

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal- vs. non-animal-recognition is a well established experiment.

    “A well established experiment is an animal- vs. non-animal-recognition task (30-34).”

    From A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization (2007) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Ultra rapid categorization is a task for which back projections are likely to be inactive.

    “Thus, a natural paradigm for comparing the performance of human observers in an object-recognition task to that of a feedforward model of visual processing is ultra rapid categorization, a task for which back projections are likely to be inactive (30, 31).”

    From A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization (2007) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Increasing the SOA on a similar animal-vs.-non-animal categorization task above 44 ms only has a minor effect on performance.

    “It was found (31) that increasing the SOA on a similar animalvs. non-animalcategorization task above 44 ms only has a minor effect on performance (accuracy scores for longer SOA conditions were not significantly different).”

    From A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization (2007) · cites this paper as [31]

  • The accuracy of the human observers is well within the range of data previously obtained with go/no-go tasks on similar tasks.

    “The accuracy of the human observers is well within the range of data previously obtained with go/no-go tasks on similar tasks (30, 31, 33).”

    From A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization (2007) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). WhatÕs new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 345-352.
  2. Hasbroucq, T., Burle, B., Bonnet, M., Possamai, C. A., & Vidal, F. (2002). Dynamique du traitement de lÕinformation sensorimotrice: apport de lÕelectrophysiologie. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(2), 75-97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Bacon-Macé, Nadège
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
45
Issue
11
Pages
1459-1469
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135566527
Cited by
236
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
backward masking, event-related potentials, information accumulation, rapid visual processing, animal recognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perceptual Masking, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Sensitivity and Specificity, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Chi-Square Distribution, Case-Control Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review