The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms (with some comments on innovation research)
Abstract
Abstract. Parallel with the growing realization by modern economists of the role that technical change plays in economic growth there has, during the last twenty years or so, and particularly during the last decade, been an upsurge of interest in research relating to technological innovation. (Mansfield, 1968a; Minasian, 1969; Aukraust, 1969; Thurow, 1971; Mansfield, 1968b). This has led to a number of studies which have aimed at discovering factors associated with success and failure in industrial innovation and the characteristics of technically progressive firms: as a result of this, there now exists a considerable and impressive body of empirical knowledge concerning successful and unsuccessful innovators. This paper briefly reviews the results of some of the more important of these innovation studies, and attempts to highlight areas of agreement between them, both concerning factors associated with success in innovation, and factors associated with failure and delay. It then comments on some of the limitations of the studies, and offers several suggestions concerning aspects of future innovation research which might go some way towards overcoming these limitations. The paper does not pretend to offer any startlingly original data or theory (although the textile machinery results are new—see Tables 1 and 2), but rather it is intended for use as an ‘innovation checklist’ for the busy manager and as a preliminary guide for those who are unfamiliar with the innovation literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II
Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. (1974) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(74)90010-9 · Cited by 717
Self-citation
Cited by
An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses
Thong, J. Y. L. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518227 · Cited by 1,727
Key Characteristics of the Large Innovating Firm*
Pavitt, K. (1991) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1991.tb00014.x · Cited by 347
Creativity in the R&D Laboratory
Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S. (1987) · doi:10.35613/ccl.1987.1088 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothwell, R.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-206
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W1971276186
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms (with some comments on innovation research). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1977.tb01334.x
- The paper
- Rothwell, R. (1977). The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms (with some comments on innovation research). R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1977.tb01334.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.