Cited by 123Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Reliability and validity of some specific fear questionnaires

FREDRIKSON, MATS·1983·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Normative psychometric data on a Swedish translation of fear questionnaires concerning snakes, spiders, public speaking, and mutilation given to 223 college students are presented. High internal consistencies were found for all four questionnaires, and low intercorrelations among the four inventories emerged. In a separate study the inventories were administered to a clinical sample of spider and snake phobics. Phobics scored higher on their respective phobic scale than the college group but did not differ from controls on mutilation or public speaking scales. A significant negative correlation emerged between snake and spider scores among the phobics. One year test‐retest reliabilities in the phobic sample were high. Finally, snake and spider phobics viewed and rated phobic and nonphobic slides. Snake phobics rated snake slides as more aversive than spider slides, whereas the reverse was true for spider phobics. The correlation between fear ratings and questionnaire scores was significant. Use of these scales in evaluating therapeutic changes is encouraged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00507.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FREDRIKSON, M.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
FREDRIKSON, MATS
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-09
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
331-334
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2036210660
Cited by
123
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
specific phobia, snake phobia, spider phobia, public speaking anxiety, Fear Questionnaire, questionnaire reliability, questionnaire validity, test-retest reliability, phobia assessment, Swedish translation
MeSH terms
Adult, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review