Cited by 193Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies

Negative beliefs of spider phobics: A psychometric evaluation of the spider phobia beliefs questionnaire

Arntz, Arnoud, Lavy, Edith, van den Berg, Germie, van Rijsoort, Stella·1993·Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90012-q

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arntz, A., Lavy, E., van den Berg, G., & van Rijsoort, S.
Affiliations
Transnational University Limburg (NL)
Corresponding author
Arntz, Arnoud
Venue
Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-01
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
257-277
ISSN
0146-6402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984479243
Cited by
192
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
18.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Keywords
spider phobia, negative beliefs, irrational beliefs, single-session intervention, psychometric properties, panic disorder, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review