Cited by 59Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Internet-based exposure treatment versus one-session exposure treatment of snake phobia: a randomized controlled trial

Andersson, Gerhard, Waara, Johan, Jonsson, Ulf, Malmaeus, Fredrik, Carlbring, Per, Öst, Lars-Göran·2013·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

In this study, the authors compared guided Internet-delivered self-help with one-session exposure treatment (OST) in a sample of snake phobic patients. A total of 30 patients were included following a screening on the Internet and a structured clinical interview. The Internet treatment consisted of four weekly text modules which were presented on a web page, a video in which exposure was modelled, and support provided via Internet. The OST was delivered in a three-hour session following a brief orientation session. The main outcome was the behavioural approach test (BAT), and as secondary measures questionnaires measuring anxiety symptoms and depression were used. Results showed that the groups did not differ at post-treatment or follow-up, with the exception of a significant interaction for the BAT in favour of the OST. At post-treatment, 61.5% of the Internet group and 84.6% of the OST group achieved a clinically significant improvement on the BAT. At follow-up, the corresponding figures were 90% for the Internet group and 100% for the OST group (completer sample). Within-group effect sizes for the Snake Phobia Questionnaire were large (d = 1.63 and d = 2.31 for the Internet and OST groups, respectively, at post-treatment). It is concluded that guided Internet-delivered exposure treatment is a potential treatment option in the treatment of snake phobia, but that OST probably is better.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2013.844202

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two Randomized Controlled Trials in Sweden for animal phobia compared in vivo exposure to a self-help ICBT with text modules and videos with guidelines to carry out exposure therapy in daily lives.

    “Regarding studies focused only on specific phobias, two Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) were conducted in Sweden for animal phobia (Andersson et al., 2009, Andersson et al., 2013). In them, in vivo exposure was compared to a self-help ICBT with text modules and videos with guidelines to carry out the exposure therapy in their daily lives.”
  • Only two studies with self-help Internet-based programs for specific phobias have been published, one on spider phobia and one on snake phobia.

    “only two studies with self-help Internet-based programs have been published, one on spider phobia [37] and one on snake phobia [38].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersson, G., Waara, J., Jonsson, U., Malmaeus, F., Carlbring, P., & Öst, L.-G.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Gerhard
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2013-12
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
284-291
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W2030862098
Cited by
59
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
snake phobia, guided self-help, anxiety symptoms, depression, phobia treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Self Care, Snakes, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review