Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Types of work‐family interface: Well‐being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family

Open access
KINNUNEN, ULLA, FELDT, TARU, GEURTS, SABINE, PULKKINEN, LEA·2006·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test the structure of the work‐family interface measure, which was intended to take into account both the positive and negative spillover between work and family demands in both directions. In addition, the links among the types of work‐family spillover and the subjects’ general and domain‐specific well‐being were examined. The sample (n= 202) consisted of Finnish employees, aged 42, who had a spouse/partner. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a four‐factor model, including negative work‐to‐family spillover, negative family‐to‐work spillover, positive work‐to‐family spillover, and positive family‐to‐work spillover, was superior compared to the other factor models examined. Path analysis showed, as hypothesized, that the negative work‐to‐family spillover was most strongly related to low well‐being at work (job exhaustion) and next strongly to low general well‐being (psychological distress), whereas the negative family‐to‐work spillover was associated with low well‐being in the domain of family (marital dissatisfaction). Positive work‐to‐family spillover was positively related both to well‐being at work and general well‐being. Inconsistent with our expectations, positive family‐to‐work spillover was not directly related to any of the well‐being indicators examined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
KINNUNEN, U., FELDT, T., GEURTS, S., & PULKKINEN, L.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-15
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
149-162
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x
OpenAlex
W2045837740
Cited by
337
References
58
FWCI
33.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Types of work‐family interface: Well‐being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x
The paper
KINNUNEN, U., FELDT, T., GEURTS, S., & PULKKINEN, L. (2006). Types of work‐family interface: Well‐being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.