Cited by 113Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceEarly Childhood Education and Development

The Implications of Having High‐achieving Versus Low‐achieving Friends: A Longitudinal Analysis

Altermatt, Ellen Rydell, Pomerantz, Eva M.·2005·Social Development

Abstract

The present research examines the achievement‐related implications of establishing friendships with high‐achieving versus low‐achieving classmates. Fifth‐ , sixth‐ , and seventh‐grade students (N=929) participated. During the fall and spring semesters, the report card grades of children and their friends were obtained and children completed questionnaire measures of their self‐evaluative beliefs and preference for challenge. Results suggest that for low‐achieving students there are tradeoffs associated with establishing and maintaining friendships with high‐achieving classmates. Specifically, low achievers who established and maintained friendships with high‐achieving friends evaluated themselves less positively, but also performed better academically, than low achievers with similarly low‐achieving friends. Fewer tradeoffs emerged for high achievers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00291.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005) found that low-achieving youth in fifth through seventh grade were more likely to report a lower academic self-concept but also higher academic engagement if they had high-achieving friends than if they had low-achieving friends.

    “Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005) found that low-achieving youth in fifth through seventh grade were more likely to report a lower academic self-concept but also higher academic engagement if they had high-achieving friends than if they had low-achieving friends.”
  • Friends' academic characteristics have been found to positively predict changes in youths' academic self-concept, engagement, and performance.

    “friends' academic characteristics have been found to positively predict changes in youths' academic selfconcept, engagement, and performance (Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Berndt & Keefe, 1995;Ryan, 2001).”
  • Affiliation with high-achieving peers may provoke social comparisons that undermine a youth's academic self-concept if a contrast is perceived between her own skills and her peers' skills.

    “affiliation with high-achieving peers may provoke social comparisons that undermine a youths' academic self-concept if a contrast is perceived between her own skills and her peers' skills (Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Dweck, 2002;Guay et al., 1999).”
  • Low-achieving youth's academic self-concept is lowest when their comparison reference is high achievers.

    “academic self-concept is lowest when their comparison reference is high achievers”
  • Studies of adolescents find that affiliation with peers who are highly academically competent may produce benefits for academic effort by motivating improvements in academic standards and performance, or by providing models for how to complete challenging academic tasks.

    “studies of adolescents find that affiliation with peers who are highly academically competent may, on the one hand, produce benefits for academic effort by motivating improvements in academic standards and performance, or by providing models for how to complete challenging academic tasks, serving as a form of”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Hanover College (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Altermatt, Ellen Rydell
Venue
Social Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-27
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
61-81
ISSN
  • 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9507
OpenAlex
W2062883636
Cited by
113
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
friendship quality, academic performance, self-assessment, junior high school students, peer effects, longitudinal development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review