The Implications of Having High‐achieving Versus Low‐achieving Friends: A Longitudinal Analysis
Abstract
The present research examines the achievement‐related implications of establishing friendships with high‐achieving versus low‐achieving classmates. Fifth‐ , sixth‐ , and seventh‐grade students (N=929) participated. During the fall and spring semesters, the report card grades of children and their friends were obtained and children completed questionnaire measures of their self‐evaluative beliefs and preference for challenge. Results suggest that for low‐achieving students there are tradeoffs associated with establishing and maintaining friendships with high‐achieving classmates. Specifically, low achievers who established and maintained friendships with high‐achieving friends evaluated themselves less positively, but also performed better academically, than low achievers with similarly low‐achieving friends. Fewer tradeoffs emerged for high achievers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005) found that low-achieving youth in fifth through seventh grade were more likely to report a lower academic self-concept but also higher academic engagement if they had high-achieving friends than if they had low-achieving friends.
“Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005) found that low-achieving youth in fifth through seventh grade were more likely to report a lower academic self-concept but also higher academic engagement if they had high-achieving friends than if they had low-achieving friends.”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005)
Friends' academic characteristics have been found to positively predict changes in youths' academic self-concept, engagement, and performance.
“friends' academic characteristics have been found to positively predict changes in youths' academic selfconcept, engagement, and performance (Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Berndt & Keefe, 1995;Ryan, 2001).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005
Affiliation with high-achieving peers may provoke social comparisons that undermine a youth's academic self-concept if a contrast is perceived between her own skills and her peers' skills.
“affiliation with high-achieving peers may provoke social comparisons that undermine a youths' academic self-concept if a contrast is perceived between her own skills and her peers' skills (Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Dweck, 2002;Guay et al., 1999).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005
Low-achieving youth's academic self-concept is lowest when their comparison reference is high achievers.
“academic self-concept is lowest when their comparison reference is high achievers”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005
Studies of adolescents find that affiliation with peers who are highly academically competent may produce benefits for academic effort by motivating improvements in academic standards and performance, or by providing models for how to complete challenging academic tasks.
“studies of adolescents find that affiliation with peers who are highly academically competent may, on the one hand, produce benefits for academic effort by motivating improvements in academic standards and performance, or by providing models for how to complete challenging academic tasks, serving as a form of”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005
There is some evidence that youths' own academic skill level moderates the effect of peers' academic skills on youths' academic self-concept.
“there is some evidence that youths' own academic skill level moderates the effect of peers' academic skills on youths' academic self-concept (Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Guay et al., 1999).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005
Cites
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971 · see citing works
The Perceived Competence Scale for Children
Harter, S. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129640 · Cited by 3,639 · see citing works
Downward comparison principles in social psychology
Wills, T. A. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 · Cited by 2,705 · see citing works
For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations
Collins, R. L. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.51 · Cited by 1,166 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Little work in the social comparison tradition has examined the implications of social comparison processes in everyday contexts (see Collins, 1996; Wood, 1989, for reviews).”
BackgroundHealth, Coping, and Well-being: Perspectives From Social Comparison Theory
Buunk, B. P. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203774106 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Blanton, H., Buunk, B. P., Gibbons, F. X., & Kuyper, H. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.420 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Particularistic and universalistic evaluation in the social comparison process.
Miller, D. T., Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.908 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431610384487 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
- Authors
- Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Hanover College (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Altermatt, Ellen Rydell
- Venue
- Social Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-81
- ISSN
- 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9507
- OpenAlex
- W2062883636
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- friendship quality, academic performance, self-assessment, junior high school students, peer effects, longitudinal development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review