Cited by 92Youth Development and Social SupportChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChildren's Rights and Participation

Future Directions in Youth Involvement Research

Rose‐Krasnor, Linda·2009·Social Development

Abstract

Youth activity involvement has received increasing research and theoretical attention and should be of particular interest to social development investigators. Involvement has been correlated with a wide range of positive developmental indices, although not for all activities nor for all children. However, our ability to interpret such findings has been restricted by measurement and design limitations. Greater attention needs to be given to assessment issues and to determining the unique effects of psychological vs. behavioral engagement, as well as to capturing the dynamic nature of engagement and the moderating role of individual differences. ‘Big picture’ models of the entire engagement process (such as the one presented here) will help identify gaps in our research knowledge and will integrate existing evidence and theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00506.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact-focused frameworks emphasized the importance of systems-level outcomes and highlighted that achieving these longer term outcomes will require innovative and critical thinking around youth engagement in research.

    “These frameworks emphasized the importance of systems‐level outcomes and highlighted that achieving these longer term outcomes will require innovative and critical thinking around youth engagement in research. 27 , 47 , 83”
  • The Youth Engagement Framework developed by Pancer and colleagues is the earliest impact-focused framework included in this review, followed by the Youth Engagement Framework developed for the Centre of Excellence for Youth Engagement (CEYE).

    “The Youth Engagement Framework 83 developed by Pancer and colleagues is the earliest impact‐focused framework included in this review, followed by the Youth Engagement Framework developed for the Centre of Excellence for Youth Engagement (CEYE), a youth‐focused organization based in Canada after which the model was named. 47”
  • Both impact-focused frameworks described three core elements of engagement: affective (emotional and subjective responses to participation), cognitive (knowledge and thoughts gained through participation), and behavioural (actions related to participation, such as attendance to an event).

    “Both frameworks described three core elements of engagement: (1) affective, involving emotional and subjective responses to participation; (2) cognitive, pertaining to knowledge and thoughts gained through participation; and (3) behavioural, referring to actions related to participations, such as attendance to an event. 47”
  • Engagement is associated with positive youth development to help young people achieve their full potential.

    “5. Developmental: Engagement is associated with positive youth development to help young people achieve their full potential. 27 , 47 , 48 , 82 , 86”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose‐Krasnor, L.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
Corresponding author
Rose‐Krasnor, Linda
Venue
Social Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-08
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
497-509
ISSN
  • 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9507
OpenAlex
W2061463414
Cited by
92
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
youth participation, psychological engagement, behavioral engagement, individual differences, moderating effect, measurement limitations, developmental outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review