The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separating Between- and Within-Cluster Covariate Effects by Using Conditional and Partitioning Methods
Open accessAbstract
Summary: We consider the situation where the random effects in a generalized linear mixed model may be correlated with one of the predictors, which leads to inconsistent estimators. We show that conditional maximum likelihood can eliminate this bias. Conditional likelihood leads naturally to the partitioning of the covariate into between- and within-cluster components and models that include separate terms for these components also eliminate the source of the bias. Another viewpoint that we develop is the idea that many violations of the assumptions (including correlation between the random effects and a covariate) in a generalized linear mixed model may be cast as misspecified mixing distributions. We illustrate the results with two examples and simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2887-0 · Cited by 3,089
Cited by
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0020141 · Cited by 3,796
Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice
Bell, A., Fairbrother, M., & Jones, K. (2019) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x · Cited by 1,085
Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis
Austin, P. C., & Merlo, J. (2017) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7336 · Cited by 649
Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis.
Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000052 · Cited by 466
Lahey, B. B., & D’Onofrio, B. M. (2010) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721410383977 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuhaus, J. M., & McCulloch, C. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-10-24
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 859-872
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2006710028
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separating Between- and Within-Cluster Covariate Effects by Using Conditional and Partitioning Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00570.x
- The paper
- Neuhaus, J. M., & McCulloch, C. E. (2006). Separating Between- and Within-Cluster Covariate Effects by Using Conditional and Partitioning Methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00570.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
