Cited by 207Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceFamily Dynamics and Relationships

All in the family: Comparing siblings to test causal hypotheses regarding environmental influences on behavior

Open access
Lahey, Benjamin B., D’Onofrio, Brian M.·2010·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Psychologists in both basic and applied fields are keenly interested in the environmental influences that shape our lives. Therefore, researchers test causal hypotheses to construct models of environmental influences that can withstand attempts at refutation. Randomized experiments provide the strongest tests of causal hypotheses, but are not always feasible and their assumptions cannot always be met. In such cases, a number of quasi-experimental research designs can be used to substantially reduce confounding in tests of causal hypotheses. Sibling-comparison designs provide robust quasi-experimental tests of causal environmental hypotheses, but they are underused in psychology in spite of their power, feasibility, and convenience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721410383977

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rubin DB Matched sampling for causal effects 2006 New York Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lahey, B. B., & D’Onofrio, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Indiana University
Corresponding author
Lahey, Benjamin B.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2010-10
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
319-323
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2155556896
Cited by
207
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD061384)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
environmental influences on behavior, causal inference, quasi-experimental design, confounding, randomized experiments, behavioral genetics, heritability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review