The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Condition-Number-Regularized Covariance Estimation
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Estimation of high dimensional covariance matrices is known to be a difficult problem, has many applications and is of current interest to the larger statistics community. In many applications including the so-called ‘large p, small n’ setting, the estimate of the covariance matrix is required to be not only invertible but also well conditioned. Although many regularization schemes attempt to do this, none of them address the ill conditioning problem directly. We propose a maximum likelihood approach, with the direct goal of obtaining a well-conditioned estimator. No sparsity assumptions on either the covariance matrix or its inverse are imposed, thus making our procedure more widely applicable. We demonstrate that the proposed regularization scheme is computationally efficient, yields a type of Steinian shrinkage estimator and has a natural Bayesian interpretation. We investigate the theoretical properties of the regularized covariance estimator comprehensively, including its regularization path, and proceed to develop an approach that adaptively determines the level of regularization that is required. Finally, we demonstrate the performance of the regularized estimator in decision theoretic comparisons and in the financial portfolio optimization setting. The approach proposed has desirable properties and can serve as a competitive procedure, especially when the sample size is small and when a well-conditioned estimator is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices
Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2004) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0047-259x(03)00096-4 · Cited by 3,046
Cited by
Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements
Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Mincheva, M. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12016 · Cited by 909
Robust and sparse correlation matrix estimation for the analysis of high-dimensional genomics data
Serra, A., Coretto, P., Fratello, M., & Tagliaferri, R. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx642 · Cited by 25
Fast probabilistic whitening transformation for ultra-high dimensional genetic data
Hoffman, G. E., Dillard, C. P., Girdhar, K., & Roussos, P. (2026) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1012320
Metadata
- Authors
- Won, J.-H., Lim, J., Kim, S.-J., & Rajaratnam, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-04
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427-450
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W1959730594
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Condition-Number-Regularized Covariance Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01049.x
- The paper
- Won, J.-H., Lim, J., Kim, S.-J., & Rajaratnam, B. (2013). Condition-Number-Regularized Covariance Estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01049.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.