Cited by 160Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Law and Policy

The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders

FAGAN, JEFFREY·1996·Law & Policy

Abstract

This study addresses the longstanding and contentious debate on the merits of transferring cases from juvenile to adult court with the expectation of more certain, severe, or effective punishment. It compares the severity, certainty and celerity of sanctions for N=800 15‐ and 16‐year‐old adolescents charged with robbery and burglary in juvenile court in New Jersey with identical offenders in matched communities in New York State whose cases are adjudicated in criminal court, and determines the effectiveness of these sanctions in reducing recidivism and reincarceration. Results showed that incarceration rates were higher for adolescents sentenced in the criminal court, but sentence lengths were comparable. However, recidivism rates were significantly lower for adolescents sentenced in the juvenile court, regardless of sentence type or severity. The results suggest that efforts to criminalize adolescent offending may not produce the desired results and may in fact be counterproductive. There is no support for legislative efforts to eliminate the special jurisprudence for adolescent crimes or the separate jurisdiction for juvenile offenders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1996.tb00165.x

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FAGAN, J.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
FAGAN, JEFFREY
Venue
Law & Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-01
Volume
18
Issue
1-2
Pages
77-114
ISSN
  • 0265-8240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9930
OpenAlex
W2091519761
Cited by
160
References
99
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Law & Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
juvenile courts, criminal courts, recidivism, juvenile offenders, felony offenses, robbery, burglary, incarceration, sentence severity, juvenile justice, New Jersey, New York State

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review