Cited by 16Criminal Law and PolicyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingLegal and Social Justice Studies

Healthy development as a human right: insights from developmental neuroscience for youth justice

Open access
Casey, B.J., Taylor-Thompson, Kim, Rubien-Thomas, Estée, Robbins, Maria, Baskin-Sommers, Arielle·2020·Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Abstract

Healthy development is a fundamental right of the individual, regardless of race, ethnicity, or social class. Youth require special protections of their rights, in part owing to vulnerabilities related to psychological and brain immaturity. These rights include not only protection against harm but opportunities for building the cognitive, emotional, and social skills necessary for becoming a contributing member of society. They apply to all youth, including those within the adult criminal justice system, which raises the legal question of when adult capacity and responsibility begin and special protections are no longer warranted. This article highlights ( a) empirical findings from developmental science on when psychological and neurobiological development reaches maturity; ( b) the extent to which this scientific knowledge guides current policies and practices in the treatment of youth in the United States; and ( c) emerging policies in the treatment of young people in the justice system based on developmental science.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031101

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sawyer W. 2018. Youth confinement: the whole pie. Press Rel., Prison Policy Initiat., Northampton, MA. https:// perma.cc/TZY3-BMBQ

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casey, B. J., Taylor-Thompson, K., Rubien-Thomas, E., Robbins, M., & Baskin-Sommers, A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • School of Law, New York University, New York, New York 10012, USA;
  • Pace University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2020-10-13
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
203-222
ISSN
  • 1550-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-3631
OpenAlex
W3028050094
Cited by
16
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Annual Review of Law and Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
Keywords
healthy development, human rights, juvenile justice, developmental neuroscience, brain development, psychological maturity, cognitive and emotional development, adult criminal justice system, age of majority, juvenile delinquency, juvenile justice policy, neurodevelopmental vulnerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review