The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women Engineers
Abstract
This article considers how women in a gendered profession, engineering, construct their professional identity in response to workplace interpersonal interactions that marginalize it. Using data from interviews with women engineers, it also explores how these interactions influence the engineers' sense of self and belonging in engineering. The interpersonal interactions place professional identity on the periphery and can overly validate gender identity. I discuss two types of identity construction strategies employed by the participants in response to these marginalizing interactions: impression management tactics and coping strategies. Although the data demonstrate that participants may be left feeling devalued or ambivalent towards their identity or fit in engineering, some interactions are more validating and offer a sense of belonging. This article also reflects on how the engineers' actions may, in fact, represent forces for change in the gendered culture of engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment
Ridgeway, C. L. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657301 · Cited by 939
‘Nuts and Bolts and People’ Gender Troubled Engineering Identities
Faulkner, W. (2015) · Philosophy of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_2 · Cited by 383
Cited by
An integrated developmental model for studying identity content in context
Galliher, R. V., McLean, K. C., & Syed, M. (2017) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000299 · Cited by 277
Gender and Prosecutorial Discretion: An Empirical Assessment
Baker, D. B., & Hassan, S. (2021) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muaa017 · Cited by 26
The Strategies of Turkish Female Managers to Break Glass Ceiling
Kaya, Y., & Tamer, G. (2024) · Sosyoekonomi · doi:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.02.14 · Cited by 8
Empresas competitivas que cuentan con entornos inclusivos y respetuosos
González Ramos, A. M. (2020) · Oikonomics · doi:10.7238/o.n13.2005 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatmaker, D. M.
- Venue
- Gender, Work & Organization
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-13
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 382-396
- ISSN
- 0968-6673 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0432
- OpenAlex
- W1930330880
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women Engineers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x
- The paper
- Hatmaker, D. M. (2013). Engineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women Engineers. Gender, Work & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.