Cited by 69Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatmentsNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Perspectives on recent advances in the understanding and treatment of Parkinson's disease

Schapira, A. H., Agid, Y., Barone, P., Jenner, P., Lemke, M. R., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., Reichmann, H. +1 more·2009·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

There have been numerous important recent advances in our understanding of the causes of Parkinson's disease (PD), the treatments available and how these are best applied for the long-term management of patients. Novel genes causing familial PD have been discovered and mechanisms leading to cell dysfunction and death identified. The PD prodrome is now a subject of great interest and clinical markers are being defined that may in future, together with biochemical markers, support an early, pre-motor diagnosis of PD. This will become important as new therapies are developed to modify disease progression. In the interim, the optimization of existing therapies remains an important priority. The value of existing and novel continuous drug delivery systems in PD is seen as providing simplified regimens, maintenance of motor control, reduction in motor complications and improved patient adherence to drug use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02793.x

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schapira, A. H., Agid, Y., Barone, P., Jenner, P., Lemke, M. R., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., Reichmann, H., & Tolosa, E.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES)
Corresponding author
Schapira, A. H.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-14
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1090-1099
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W2090946270
Cited by
69
References
87
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, familial Parkinson's disease, prodromal symptoms, early diagnosis, clinical biomarkers, biochemical markers, long-term management, continuous drug delivery, motor complications, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Autophagy, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Humans, Neurons, Parkinson Disease, Drug Delivery Systems, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review