Employment tests and discriminatory hiring
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two initial foci of fairness research were unfairness of standardized tests in higher education contexts and discrimination in employment contexts.
“Two initial foci of fairness research were unfairness of standardized tests in higher education contexts [72,73] and discrimination in employment contexts [133].”
From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [133]
Discrimination in hiring decisions has been examined since the 1960s.
“For example, discrimination in hiring decisions has been examined since the 1960s [133].”
From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [133]
Cites
Differential Predictability in the Use of Test Scores
Frederiksen, N., & Melville, S. D. (1954) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316445401400407 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
IMPROVING TEST VALIDITY BY COACHING
Ortar, G. R. (1960) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/0013188600020206 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Hay, E. N. (1950) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1950.tb01698.x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fairness in machine learning: A survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3616865 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning
Hutchinson, B., & Mitchell, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287600 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04053 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
UTILITIES AND THE ISSUE OF FAIRNESS IN A DECISION THEORETIC MODEL FOR SELECTION
SAWYER, R. L., COLE, N. S., & COLE, J. W. L. (1976) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00182.x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- GUION, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Bowling Green State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- GUION, ROBERT M.
- Venue
- Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1966-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 20-37
- ISSN
- 0019-8676 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-232X
- OpenAlex
- W2031449720
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- employment testing, employment discrimination, personnel selection, hiring practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
