The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Evidence on Gender Differences in Promotion Rates: An Empirical Analysis of a Sample of New Hires
Open accessAbstract
Using a large sample of establishments drawn from the Multi‐City Study of Urban Inequality employer survey, we studied gender differences in promotion rates and in the wage gains attached to promotions. Several unique features of our data distinguish our analysis from the previous literature on this topic. First, we have information on the wage increases attached to promotions, and relatively few studies on gender differences have considered promotions and wage increases together. Second, our data include job‐specific worker performance ratings, allowing us to control for performance and ability more precisely than through commonly used skill indicators such as educational attainment or tenure. Third, in addition to standard information on occupation and industry, we have data on a number of other firm characteristics, enabling us to control for these variables while still relying on a broad, representative sample, as opposed to a single firm or a similarly narrowly defined population. Our results indicate that women have lower probabilities of promotion and expected promotion than men do but that there is essentially no gender difference in wage growth with or without promotions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets
Oaxaca, R. (1973) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525981 · Cited by 8,463
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,288
Men and Women of the Corporation
Devanna, M. A. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188637801400208 · Cited by 6,354
The Economics of Discrimination.
Collard, D., & Becker, G. S. (1972) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230052 · Cited by 3,573
The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.
Phelps, E. S. (1972) · American Economic Review · Cited by 3,412
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role interpretation
Eagly, A. H. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781906 · Cited by 3,320
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation.
Doherty, E. G., & Eagly, A. H. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073813 · Cited by 3,266
Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor
Becker, G. S. (1985) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/298075 · Cited by 2,417
The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the "Female" Professions
Williams, C. L. (1992) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1992.39.3.03x0034h · Cited by 1,328
Cited by
Development of a new scale to measure subjective career success: A mixed-methods study
Shockley, K. M., Ureksoy, H., Rodopman, O. B., Poteat, L. F., & Dullaghan, T. R. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2046 · Cited by 372
Organizational Approaches to Inequality: Inertia, Relative Power, and Environments
Stainback, K., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Skaggs, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120014 · Cited by 293
A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes
Reskin, B. F., & Bielby, D. D. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330053148010 · Cited by 275
Self‐Selection and the Forecasting Abilities of Female Equity Analysts
KUMAR, A. (2010) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2009.00362.x · Cited by 263
Women face a labyrinth: an examination of metaphors for women leaders
Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2016) · Gender in Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/gm-02-2015-0007 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- BLAU, F. D., & DEVARO, J.
- Venue
- Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-15
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-550
- ISSN
- 0019-8676 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-232X
- OpenAlex
- W2119851103
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 22.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Evidence on Gender Differences in Promotion Rates: An Empirical Analysis of a Sample of New Hires. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-232x.2007.00479.x
- The paper
- BLAU, F. D., & DEVARO, J. (2007). New Evidence on Gender Differences in Promotion Rates: An Empirical Analysis of a Sample of New Hires. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232x.2007.00479.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.