The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women face a labyrinth: an examination of metaphors for women leaders
Abstract
Abstract Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the most common general metaphors for women's leadership: the glass ceiling, sticky floor and the labyrinth. The authors discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these metaphors for characterizing women's current situation as leaders. Design/methodology/approach In addition to reviewing the literature on the status of women leaders, the authors also discuss recent research on the power of metaphor to illustrate concepts and influence social judgments. Findings The authors conclude that the labyrinth is the most useful metaphor for women leaders, because although there has been slow steady improvement in women's access to leadership, women continue to face challenges that men do not face: gender stereotypes that depict women as unsuited to leadership, discrimination in pay and promotion, lack of access to powerful mentors and networks and greater responsibility for childcare and other domestic responsibilities. Practical implications Although the glass ceiling metaphor implies that women face obstacles once they have risen to very high levels of leadership and the sticky floor metaphor implies that women are prevented from any advancement beyond entry level, the labyrinth reflects the myriad obstacles that women face throughout their careers. Originality/value The labyrinth metaphor not only acknowledges these challenges but also suggests that women can advance to very high levels of leadership.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Self-citationTransformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 · Cited by 4,170
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569 · Cited by 2,547
Self-citationGetting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/511799 · Cited by 2,525
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100404 · Cited by 2,052
Through the labyrinth: the truth about how women become leaders
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-6881 · Cited by 1,860
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023557 · Cited by 1,748
Self-citationThe Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the "Female" Professions
Williams, C. L. (1992) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1992.39.3.03x0034h · Cited by 1,328
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601111401017 · Cited by 1,315
Is There a Glass Ceiling over Europe? Exploring the Gender Pay Gap across the Wage Distribution
Arulampalam, W., Booth, A. L., & Bryan, M. L. (2007) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979390706000201 · Cited by 829
Cited by
Women and leadership: Gender barriers to senior management positions
Rincón, V., González, M., & Barrero, K. (2017) · Intangible Capital · doi:10.3926/ic.889 · Cited by 82
Women and Leadership: How Do Women Leaders Contribute to Companies' Sustainable Choices?
Pierli, G., Murmura, F., & Palazzi, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2022.930116 · Cited by 52
Some Leaders Come from Nowhere: Their Success Is Uneven
Eagly, A. H. (2018) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12263 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H.
- Venue
- Gender in Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 514-527
- ISSN
- 1754-2413 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2522347887
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 24.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women face a labyrinth: an examination of metaphors for women leaders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/gm-02-2015-0007
- The paper
- Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2016). Women face a labyrinth: an examination of metaphors for women leaders. Gender in Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-02-2015-0007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.