The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic Orientations in Management Literature: Three Approaches to Understanding the Interaction between Market, Technology, Entrepreneurial and Learning Orientations
Abstract
Market, technology, entrepreneurial and learning orientations have attracted major scholarly interest within their specific streams of literature for some decades. These strategic orientations are seen as principles that direct and influence the activities of a firm and generate the behaviours intended to ensure its viability and performance. Prior studies have argued that firms should develop and use multiple orientations, yet the relationship between different orientations has received only fragmented attention. This paper presents a systematic review of this literature, covering 67 scholarly articles published between 1987 and 2010 which investigate multiple orientations. The paper contributes first by summarizing the current state of knowledge on the interplay between these orientations. Many of these relationships have not been studied to any great degree, and there are research gaps in the information available on the relationships between entrepreneurial, technology and learning orientation in particular. Secondly, the paper contributes to further theoretical and empirical enquiry by synthesizing the empirical findings into a three-approach framework. The sequential, alternatives and complementary approaches to perceiving the relationship between orientations all suggest areas for further research. The sequential approach could further contribute by developing better constructs for explaining the orientation of the firm; while the alternatives approach could increase its relevance to management through the exploration of contingency settings and comparative studies. The complementary approach encourages discussion between researchers from the different streams of literature through the investigation of the relationships. It suggests focus on the investigation of both universal- and contingency-dependent-orientation configurations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 3×
“Learning may be viewed, as in Huber (1991), as the development or acquisition of new knowledge which has the potential to influence behaviour; a more rigorous view assumes that learning actually results in new behaviours or value creation (Argyris and Schön 1978).”
BackgroundClarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568 · Cited by 10,159
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400403 · Cited by 7,947
Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250100107 · Cited by 5,981
The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms
Miller, D. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 · Cited by 5,853
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Market Orientation and the Learning Organization
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299505900306 · Cited by 4,366
Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700304 · Cited by 4,343
Cited by
The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4 · Cited by 1,319
Entrepreneurial Learning: Past Research and Future Challenges
Wang, C. L., & Chugh, H. (2014) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12007 · Cited by 585
Ardito, L., Raby, S., Albino, V., & Bertoldi, B. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.022 · Cited by 485
Masa’deh, R., Al-Henzab, J., Tarhini, A., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2018) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-02-2017-0024 · Cited by 298
Dynamic capabilities and SME performance: The moderating effect of market orientation
Hernández-Linares, R., Kellermanns, F. W., & López-Fernández, M. C. (2021) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12474 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Hakala, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-26
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-217
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1670527009
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 22.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic Orientations in Management Literature: Three Approaches to Understanding the Interaction between Market, Technology, Entrepreneurial and Learning Orientations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00292.x
- The paper
- Hakala, H. (2011). Strategic Orientations in Management Literature: Three Approaches to Understanding the Interaction between Market, Technology, Entrepreneurial and Learning Orientations. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00292.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.