The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana
Abstract
Before the Great Recession's foreshocks in fall 2007, most American security studies scholars believed that unipolarity—and perforce American hegemony—would be enduring features of international politics far into the future. However, in the Great Recession's aftermath, it is apparent that much has changed since 2007. Predictions of continuing unipolarity have been superseded by premonitions of American decline and geopolitical transformation. The Great Recession has had a two-fold impact. First, it highlighted the shift of global wealth—and power—from West to East, a trend illustrated by China's breathtakingly rapid rise to great power status. Second, it has raised doubts about the robustness of US primacy's economic and financial underpinnings. This article argues that the Aunipolar moment is over, and the Pax Americana—the era of American ascendancy in international politics that began in 1945—is fast winding down. This article challenges the conventional wisdom among International Relations/Security Studies scholars on three counts. First, it shows that contrary to the claims of unipolar stability theorists, the distribution of power in the international system no longer is unipolar. Second, this article revisits the 1980s' debate about American decline and demonstrates that the Great Recession has vindicated the so-called declinists of that decade. Finally, this article takes on the Ainstitutional lock-in argument, which holds that by strengthening the Pax Americana's legacy institutions, the United States can perpetuate the essential elements of the international order it constructed following World War II even as the material foundations of American primacy erode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
War and Change in World Politics
Gilpin, R. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664267 · Cited by 4,020
The tragedy of Great Power politics
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-5464 · Cited by 3,594
The Political Economy of International Relations
Gilpin, R. (1987) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400882779 · Cited by 2,583
Fukuyama, F. (1989) · Quadrant · Cited by 1,711
Walt, S. M. (2019) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801469992 · Cited by 1,535
After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars
Ikenberry, G. J. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400823963 · Cited by 1,461
The rise and fall of the great powers
Kennedy, P. (1988) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(88)90030-4 · Cited by 1,366
Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2390 · Cited by 1,305
After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars
Smith, T., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2001) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20050090 · Cited by 1,264
The Stability of a Unipolar World
Wohlforth, W. C. (1999) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228899560031 · Cited by 1,241
Cited by
Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00225 · Cited by 386
“The persistent myth of lost hegemony,” revisited: structural power as a complex network phenomenon
Winecoff, W. K. (2020) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066120952876 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Layne, C.
- Venue
- International Studies Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 203-213
- ISSN
- 0020-8833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146476927
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 142.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00704.x
- The paper
- Layne, C. (2012). This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00704.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.