The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current directions in videoconferencing tele-mental health research
Open accessAbstract
The provision of mental health services via videoconferencing tele-mental health has become an increasingly routine component of mental health service delivery throughout the world. Emphasizing the research literature since 2003, we examine: 1) the extent to which the field of tele-mental health has advanced the research agenda previously suggested; and 2) implications for tele-mental health care delivery for special clinical populations. Previous findings have demonstrated that tele-mental health services are satisfactory to patients, improve outcomes, and are probably cost effective. In the very small number of randomized controlled studies that have been conducted to date, tele-mental health has demonstrated equivalent efficacy compared to face-to-face care in a variety of clinical settings and with specific patient populations. However, methodologically flawed or limited research studies are the norm, and thus the research agenda for tele-mental health has not been fully maximized. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These studies have generally found that videoconferencing is effective and acceptable to patients (7).”
From Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health (2013) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rheingold, H. (1991) · Cited by 1,804
Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine
Mair, F. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1517 · Cited by 734 · cited 1×
“…standardized clinical outcome measures, instead emphasizing satisfaction as a primary outcome domain (Antonacci et al., 2008; Myers, Valentine, & Melzer, 2008), even when psychometric properties of satisfaction measures were unknown or questionable (for a review, see Mair & Whitten, 2000).”
O'Reilly, R., Bishop, J., Maddox, K., Hutchinson, L., Fisman, M., & Takhar, J. (2007) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.836 · Cited by 369 · cited 11×
“…are difficult to replicate (O’Reilly et al., 2007; Ruskin et al., 2004), relatively small clinical within-group change between delivery conditions (O’Reilly et al., 2007), and as noted by others (Antonacci et al., 2008; Greene, Morland, Durkalski, & Frueh, 2008) flawed conceptual and…”
InfluentialRuskin, P., Silver-Aylaian, M., Kling, M., Reed, S., Bradham, D., Hebel, J., Barrett, D., Knowles, F. G., & Hauser, P. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1471 · Cited by 354 · cited 9×
“However, only a handful of randomized, controlled studies of tele-mental health clinical outcomes has been published (De Las Cuevas, Arredondo, Cabrera, Sulzenbacher, & Meise, 2006; Fortney et al., 2007; Frueh, Monnier, Yim et al., 2007b; O’Reilly et al., 2007; Poon, Hui, Dai, Kwok, & Woo, 2005; Ruskin et al., 2004).”
InfluentialA randomized trial of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression
Fortney, J. C., Pyne, J. M., Edlund, M. J., Williams, D. K., Robinson, D. E., Mittal, D., & Henderson, K. L. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0201-9 · Cited by 315 · cited 4×
“…of randomized, controlled studies of tele-mental health clinical outcomes has been published (De Las Cuevas, Arredondo, Cabrera, Sulzenbacher, & Meise, 2006; Fortney et al., 2007; Frueh, Monnier, Yim et al., 2007b; O’Reilly et al., 2007; Poon, Hui, Dai, Kwok, & Woo, 2005; Ruskin et al., 2004).”
InfluentialDelivering Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia in Videoconference
Bouchard, S., Paquin, B., Payeur, R., Allard, M., Rivard, V., Fournier, T., Renaud, P., & Lapierre, J. (2004) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/153056204773644535 · Cited by 267 · cited 4×
“CBT may be particularly well suited to tele-mental health in that it is focused on learning principles, is often time limited, and may not be as dependent on the therapeutic relationship than other insight-oriented or experiential therapies, thereby reducing the potential impact of technological interference on therap…”
MethodInfluentialTreating Childhood Depression over Videoconferencing
Nelson, E., BARNARD, M. U., & Cain, S. (2003) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/153056203763317648 · Cited by 267 · cited 3×
“Reporting twice on various outcomes of the same study, Nelson et al. (2003, 2006) reported positive and equivalent treatment outcomes between videoconferencing and face-to-face conditions.”
Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry
May, C., Gask, L., Atkinson, T., Ellis, N., Mair, F., & Esmail, A. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00305-1 · Cited by 251 · cited 2×
“…health services, clinicians have often reported lower expectations regarding the value of tele-mental health (Austen & McGrath, 2006a; Cruz, Krupinski, Lopez, & Weinstein, 2005; Elford et al., 2000; May et al., 2001; Schopp, Johnstone, & Merrell, 2000; Werner, 2004; Whitten & Kuwahara, 2004).”
A randomized, controlled trial of child psychiatric assessments conducted using videoconferencing
Elford, R. W., White, H., Bowering, R., Ghandi, A., Maddigan, B., & John, K. S. (2000) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/1357633001935086 · Cited by 243 · cited 4×
“…health services, clinicians have often reported lower expectations regarding the value of tele-mental health (Austen & McGrath, 2006a; Cruz, Krupinski, Lopez, & Weinstein, 2005; Elford et al., 2000; May et al., 2001; Schopp, Johnstone, & Merrell, 2000; Werner, 2004; Whitten & Kuwahara, 2004).”
InfluentialClinical and Educational Telepsychiatry Applications: A Review
Hilty, D. M., Marks, S. L., Urness, D., Yellowlees, P., & Nesbitt, T. S. (2004) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370404900103 · Cited by 224
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Baer, 1997, Telemedicine: Theory and practice, 265
- Hilty, 2003, The effectiveness of telepsychiatry: A review, Canadian Psychiatric Association Bulletin, 35, 10
- Institute of Medicine, 2004, Quality through collaboration: The future of rural mental health
- Morland, 2003, PTSD and tele-mental health: Updates and future directions, National Center for PTSD Clinical Quarterly, 12, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Effectiveness of Telemental Health: A 2013 Review
Hilty, D. M., Ferrer, D. C., Parish, M. B., Johnston, B., Callahan, E. J., & Yellowlees, P. M. (2013) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0075 · Cited by 1,048
Mohr, D. C., Burns, M. N., Schueller, S. M., Clarke, G., & Klinkman, M. (2013) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008 · Cited by 693
“These studies have generally found that videoconferencing is effective and acceptable to patients [7].”
Videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review
Backhaus, A., Agha, Z., Maglione, M. L., Repp, A., Ross, B., Zuest, D., Rice-Thorp, N. M., Lohr, J., & Thorp, S. R. (2012) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/a0027924 · Cited by 586
Therapeutic alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A review
Simpson, S. G., & Reid, C. L. (2014) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/ajr.12149 · Cited by 420
Barriers to Use of Telepsychiatry: Clinicians as Gatekeepers
Cowan, K. E., McKean, A. J., Gentry, M. T., & Hilty, D. M. (2019) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018 · Cited by 380
“LIMITED EDUCATION FOR CLINICIANS/ LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES Limited education, clinical exposure, and hands-on learning in telepsychiatry are significant barriers to expanding use.(8,11,20,27,28,31,35,38,40,47,59,89,104,105,107-110) Telepsychiatry education in medical school and residency is minimal,(8,47,110) with only…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, L. K., Frueh, B. C., Grubaugh, A. L., Egede, L., & Elhai, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Murdoch University (AU)
- Houston Methodist (US)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- University of South Dakota (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-338
- ISSN
- 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2850
- PMC
- PMC2758653
- OpenAlex
- W2048357365
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 143
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K24MH074468)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- telemental health, videoconferencing, telemedicine, mental health service delivery, research agenda, randomized controlled trials, treatment efficacy, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, methodological limitations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
