Cited by 586Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review

Backhaus, Autumn, Agha, Zia, Maglione, Melissa L., Repp, Andrea, Ross, Bridgett, Zuest, Danielle, Rice-Thorp, Natalie M., Lohr, James +1 more·2012·Psychological Services

Abstract

Individuals with mental health problems may face barriers to accessing effective psychotherapies. Videoconferencing technology, which allows audio and video information to be shared concurrently across geographical distances, offers an alternative that may improve access. We conducted a systematic literature review of the use of videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP), designed to address 10 specific questions, including therapeutic types/formats that have been implemented, the populations with which VCP is being used, the number and types of publications related to VCP, and available satisfaction, feasibility, and outcome data related to VCP. After electronic searches and reviews of reference lists, 821 potential articles were identified, and 65 were selected for inclusion. The results indicate that VCP is feasible, has been used in a variety of therapeutic formats and with diverse populations, is generally associated with good user satisfaction, and is found to have similar clinical outcomes to traditional face-to-face psychotherapy. Although the number of articles being published on VCP has increased in recent years, there remains a need for additional large-scale clinical trials to further assess the efficacy and effectiveness of VCP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027924

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Backhaus, A., Agha, Z., Maglione, M. L., Repp, A., Ross, B., Zuest, D., Rice-Thorp, N. M., Lohr, J., & Thorp, S. R.
Affiliations
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2012-05
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
111-131
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W2004680148
Cited by
586
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Veterans Health Administration (DH107-054-2)
  • Department of Defense (W81XWH-08-2-0076)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
external beam radiotherapy, access to mental health care, barriers to psychotherapy, feasibility, user satisfaction, clinical outcomes, remote psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychotherapy, Telecommunications, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review