The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How does the comforting process work? An empirical test of an appraisal‐based model of comforting
Abstract
Burleson and Goldsmith’s (1998) comforting model suggests an appraisal-based mechanism through which comforting messages can bring about a positive change in emotional states. This study is a first empirical test of three causal linkages implied by the appraisal-based comforting model. Participants (N = 258) talked about an upsetting event with a confederate trained to display low, moderate, or high levels of person centeredness and nonverbal immediacy. After the conversation, participants completed several scales. Latent composite structural equation modeling was used to examine the model, which showed that person-centered and immediate emotional support exerted a direct effect on emotional improvement. Above and beyond this direct effect, person-centered comfort also encouraged people to verbalize their thoughts and emotions. These verbalizations facilitated cognitive appraisals, which in turn exerted a strong direct effect on emotional improvement. Mediation analyses further suggested that verbalizations of positive emotion words in conjunction with reappraisals partially mediated the influence of person-centered comfort on emotional improvement.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These findings expand on the work of communication scholars who have either focused on resulting perceptions but not beneficial outcomes of disclosure (Birnbaum et al., 2016; Gong & Nass, 2007) or on beneficial outcomes when the listener is always human, but not when the listener is a computer (Jones & Wirtz, 2006).”
From Psychological, Relational, and Emotional Effects of Self-Disclosure After Conversations With a Chatbot (2018) · cites this paper as Jones & Wirtz, 2006
Citations
Cites
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity.
Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.2.234 · Cited by 3,030
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves
Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 · Cited by 2,624
The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0104_1 · Cited by 960 · cited 2×
“Undoubtedly, immediacy cues are beneficial because they serve to coordinate interaction and generate rapport (Jones & Wirtz, in press; Tickle-Degnen & Rosenthal, 1990), but person-centered messages might be particularly important in fulfilling this function.”
BackgroundAssessing specific mediational effects in complex theoretical models
Brown, R. L. (1997) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519709540067 · Cited by 288
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Andersen P. A, 1985, Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior, 1
- Andersen J. F., 1979, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 153, 10.1080/00909887909365204 · DOI
- Applegate J. L, 1980, Studies in Symbolic Interactionism, 3, 59, 10.1525/si.1980.3.1.59 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- Bollen K. A, 1989, Structural equations with latent variables, 10.1002/9781118619179 · DOI
- Breuer J., 1961, Studies in hysteria
- Burgoon J. K., 1988, Communication Monographs, 55, 58, 10.1080/03637758809376158 · DOI
- Burgoon J. K., 1995, Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns, 10.1017/CBO9780511720314 · DOI
- Burleson B. R, 1994, Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community, 3
- Burleson B. R., 1998, Communication and emotion, 246
- Burleson B. R., 2002, Handbook of interpersonal communication, 374
- Burleson B. R., 1985, Central States Speech Journal, 36, 39, 10.1080/10510978509363198 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327027hc1703_2 · DOI
- Clore G. L, 1994, The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions, 181
- Cohen J., 1983, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00115.x · DOI
- Donnelly D. A., 1991, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 334, 10.1521/jscp.1991.10.3.334 · DOI
- Dunkel-Schetter C., 1987, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 80
- Efron B., 1998, An introduction to the bootstrap
- 10.1007/BF00993115 · DOI
- Folkman S., 1988, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 123
- Folkman S., 2000, Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives, 111
- Frijda N. H, 1993, Handbook of emotions, 381
- Goldsmith D. J, 1994, Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community, 29
- Goldsmith D. J, 2004, Communicating social support, 10.1017/CBO9780511606984 · DOI
- Greenberg L. S., 1993, Facilitating emotional change: The moment-by-moment process
- 10.1007/BF00985984 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-006X.65.4.599 · DOI
- Hu L., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, applications, 76
- 10.1177/0093650204263436 · DOI
- Jones S. M., 1997, Communication Research, 24, 530, 10.1177/009365097024005004 · DOI
- 10.1093/hcr/27.4.567 · DOI
- Jones S. M., Communication Studies
- Kline R. B, 2001, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
- Kunkel A. W., 1999, Human Communication Research, 25, 307, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00448.x · DOI
- Lazarus R. S, 1991, Emotion and adaptation, 10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Lazarus R. S, 1999, Stress and emotion: A new synthesis
- Lazarus R. S., 1984, Stress, appraisal, and coping
- LePoire B. A., 1999, Communication Monographs, 66, 1, 10.1080/03637759909376460 · DOI
- Lyons R. F., 1998, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 579, 10.1177/0265407598155001 · DOI
- Mind and body, 2003, Time
- 10.1007/BF02102784 · DOI
- Pasupathi M, 2003, Memory, 11, 151, 10.1080/741938212 · DOI
- 10.1080/026999396380079 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.52.4.781 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.72.4.863 · DOI · Paper page
- Pennebaker J. W., 2001, Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care, 517, 10.1037/10436-022 · DOI
- Plutchik R, 1984, Approaches to emotion, 197
- Preacher K. J., 2006, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in simple and multiple mediator models
- Ptacek J. T., 1994, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 421, 10.1177/0146167294204009 · DOI · Paper page
- Quintana S. M., 1999, The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485, 10.1177/0011000099274002 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.410 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith C. A., 1993, Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233, 10.1080/02699939308409189 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith C. A., 1992, Emotion and social behavior, 32
- Smyth J. M., 1999, Coping: The psychology of what works, 70
- 10.1177/0093650203030003004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.169 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-006X.54.4.416 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-295X.96.2.234 · DOI · Paper page
- Winstead B. A., 1992, Communication Research, 19, 193, 10.1177/009365092019002004 · DOI
- 10.1177/0265407504042833 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774
Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy026 · Cited by 629
“…on the work of communication scholars who have either focused on resulting perceptions but not bene fi cial outcomes of disclosure (Birnbaum et al., 2016; Gong & Nass, 2007) or on bene fi cial outcomes when the listener is always human, but not when the listener is a computer (Jones & Wirtz, 2006).”
BackgroundThe Impact of Mindfulness on Supportive Communication Skills: Three Exploratory Studies
Jones, S. M., & Hansen, W. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0362-7 · Cited by 57
Self-citationSzkody, E., & McKinney, C. (2020) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2957 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, S. M., & Wirtz, J. G.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-243
- ISSN
- 0360-3989
- 1468-2958
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review