Cited by 11,335Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.

Shrout, Patrick E., Bolger, Niall·2002·Psychological Methods

Abstract

Mediation is said to occur when a causal effect of some variable X on an outcome Y is explained by some intervening variable M. The authors recommend that with small to moderate samples, bootstrap methods (B. Efron & R. Tibshirani, 1993) be used to assess mediation. Bootstrap tests are powerful because they detect that the sampling distribution of the mediated effect is skewed away from 0. They argue that R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny's (1986) recommendation of first testing the X --> Y association for statistical significance should not be a requirement when there is a priori belief that the effect size is small or suppression is a possibility. Empirical examples and computer setups for bootstrap analyses are provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Arbuckle, 1999, AMOS 4
  2. Bentler, 1997, EQS for Windows (Version 5.6)
  3. Eagly, 1993, The psychology of attitudes.
  4. 10.2307/2289064 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Joreskog, 1993, LISREL 8 (Version 8.12)
  6. 1999, Excel 2000
  7. 10.2307/2686058 · DOI
  8. 1989, SAS (Version 6.12)
  9. 1999, SPSS (Version 9)
  10. 1999, S-PLUS

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
2002
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
422-445
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2104057213
Cited by
11,335
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 347 · 2025: 533 · 2024: 574 · 2023: 547 · 2022: 708 · 2021: 743 · 2020: 687 · 2019: 685 · 2018: 627 · 2017: 643 · 2016: 657 · 2015: 658 · 2014: 679 · 2013: 658 · 2012: 598
FWCI
44.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH60366, MH60366, R01MH060366)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
mediation analysis, bootstrapping, indirect effects, mediators, suppression effect, small sample inference, experimental study, statistical significance testing
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review