Cited by 88Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringReligion and Society InteractionsSocial Capital and Networks

Religious Diversity and Community Volunteerism Among Asian Americans

ECKLUND, ELAINE HOWARD, PARK, JERRY Z.·2007·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

We examine whether religious membership and participation foster community volunteerism among a religiously diverse group of Asian Americans. We use data from the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey (SCCBS), the only data set that contains both a large, national sample of Asian Americans and detailed questions on religious and civic participation. Asian‐American Protestants, Catholics, and adherents of non‐Christian religions are involved in community volunteerism to varying degrees. Surprisingly, however, fewer Hindus and Buddhists volunteer when compared to the nonaffiliated. We use these results to propose theoretical concepts that take into account the impact of a religion's structure as well as the double‐minority status faced by nonwhite and non‐Christian Asian Americans on the likelihood of volunteering. Our findings indicate that accepted predictors of community volunteerism may operate differently among new nonwhite immigrants and their children than in the general U.S. population; this provides building blocks for future research on religion and civic participation among nonwhite and non‐Christian populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00353.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 20 best studies on R/S and altruism, 15 (75%) reported positive relationships and two (10%) found negative associations.

    “of the 20 best studies, 15 (75%) reported positive relationships [108–113] and two (10%) found negative associations [114, 115] (both concerning organ donations, which some religions prohibit).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ECKLUND, E. H., & PARK, J. Z.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
  • ECKLUND, ELAINE HOWARD
  • PARK, JERRY Z.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-15
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
233-244
ISSN
  • 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5906
OpenAlex
W2021553427
Cited by
88
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Funders
Society for the Scientific Study of Religion
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
Keywords
religious diversity, Asian Americans, religious membership, religious participation, citizen participation, Hindus, Buddhists, non-Christian religions, immigrant children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review