Cited by 92Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Extending Religion-Health Research to Secular Minorities: Issues and Concerns

Hwang, Karen, Hammer, Joseph H., Cragun, Ryan T.·2011·Journal of Religion and Health

Abstract

Claims about religion's beneficial effects on physical and psychological health have received substantial attention in popular media, but empirical support for these claims is mixed. Many of these claims are tenuous because they fail to address basic methodological issues relating to construct validity, sampling methods or analytical problems. A more conceptual problem has to do with the near universal lack of atheist control samples. While many studies include samples of individuals classified as "low spirituality" or religious "nones", these groups are heterogeneous and contain only a fraction of members who would be considered truly secular. We illustrate the importance of including an atheist control group whenever possible in the religiosity/spirituality and health research and discuss areas for further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10943-009-9296-0

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, K., Hammer, J. H., & Cragun, R. T.
Affiliations
  • Kessler Foundation (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of Tampa (US)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Karen
Venue
Journal of Religion and Health
Published
2009-10-28
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
608-622
ISSN
  • 0022-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6571
OpenAlex
W2005211471
Cited by
92
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Religion and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
religion and health, atheists, religious nones, construct validity, sampling methods, control groups, religiosity, spirituality, physical health, mental health
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Religion and Medicine, Research, United States, Spirituality, Secularism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review