Cited by 114Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The adult intestinal core microbiota is determined by analysis depth and health status

Open access
Salonen, A., Salojärvi, J., Lahti, L., de Vos, W.M.·2012·Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Abstract

High-throughput molecular methods are currently exploited to characterize the complex and highly individual intestinal microbiota in health and disease. Definition of the human intestinal core microbiota, i.e. the number and the identity of bacteria that are shared among different individuals, is currently one of the main research questions. Here we apply a high-throughput phylogenetic microarray, for a comprehensive and high-resolution microbiota analysis, and a novel computational approach in a quantitative study of the core microbiota in over 100 individuals. In the approach presented we study how the criteria for the phylotype abundance or prevalence influence the resulting core in parallel with biological variables, such as the number and health status of the study subjects. We observed that the core size is highly conditional, mostly depending on the depth of the analysis and the required prevalence of the core taxa. Moreover, the core size is also affected by biological variables, of which the health status had a larger impact than the number of studied subjects. We also introduce a computational method that estimates the expected size of the core, given the varying prevalence and abundance criteria. The approach is directly applicable to sequencing data derived from intestinal and other host-associated microbial communities, and can be modified to include more informative definitions of core microbiota. Hence, we anticipate its utilization will facilitate the conceptual definition of the core microbiota and its consequent characterization so that future studies yield conclusive views on the intestinal core microbiota, eliminating the current controversy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03855.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salonen, A., Salojärvi, J., Lahti, L., & de Vos, W. M.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
18
Pages
16-20
ISSN
1198-743X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105288471
Cited by
114
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
human gut microbiome, sequencing depth, health status, microbial community analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Electronic Data Processing, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Phylogeny, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microarray Analysis, Metagenome, Metagenomics, Biota, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review