Cited by 39Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Multi-population cohort meta-analysis of human intestinal microbiota in early life reveals the existence of infant community state types (ICSTs)

Open access
Mancabelli, Leonardo, Tarracchini, Chiara, Milani, Christian, Lugli, Gabriele Andrea, Fontana, Federico, Turroni, Francesca, van Sinderen, Douwe, Ventura, Marco·2020·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Appropriate development of the intestinal microbiota during infancy is known to be important for human health. In fact, aberrant alterations of the microbial composition during childhood may cause short- and/or long-term negative health effects. Many factors influence the initial assembly and subsequent progression of the gut microbiota of a neonate, such as feeding type, delivery mode, gestational age, maternal metabolic status and antibiotic exposure. In the current study, the composition of the infant gut core-microbiota was explored, revealing particular variations of this core-microbiota during the first three years as influenced by delivery mode and feeding type. A multi-population cohort meta-analysis was performed by selecting 15 publicly available datasets pertaining to taxonomic profiles of 1035 fecal samples of healthy infants, as obtained by means of a 16S rRNA gene-based profiling approach. Interestingly, this multi-population cohort meta-analysis revealed great microbial complexity and specific taxonomic shifts in children older than six months, suggesting a major impact by the introduction of solid foods which prompts progression of infant gut microbiota towards that typical of adults. The taxonomic data sets employed in this multi-population cohort meta-analysis possess the statistical robustness to allow the identification of infant community state types (ICSTs). Our analysis therefore reveals the existence of specific taxonomic patterns that correspond to particular nutritional and developmental stages of early life, and that had previously been obscured by the high variability typical of such infant gut microbiota.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.028

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthy newborns, E. coli can account on average for 15% of the entire gut microbiota and up to 40% in some subjects.

    “In healthy newborns, E. coli can account, on average, for 15% of the entire gut microbiota and up to 40% in some subjects [135].”

    From Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces (2026) · cites this paper as [135]

    The Results and discussion section (‘Influence of feeding on the infant microbiota’; page unavailable) reports an average Escherichia-Shigella abundance of 13.38% in breastfed infants aged 0–1 month and 35.25% in formula-fed infants of that age. These are genus-level, feeding-specific averages; the passage does not establish a 15% average for E. coli across healthy newborns or an abundance of up to 40% in individual subjects. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mancabelli, L., Tarracchini, C., Milani, C., Lugli, G. A., Fontana, F., Turroni, F., van Sinderen, D., & Ventura, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • APC Microbiome Institute and School of Microbiology, Bioscience Institute, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland
Corresponding author
Ventura, Marco
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2020-01
Volume
18
Pages
2480-2493
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3086115526
Cited by
39
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Università degli Studi di Parma
  • European Commission (15/JP/HDHL/3280)
  • Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/12/RC/2273-P1, SFI/12/RC/2273-P2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
infant gut microbiota, community state types, core microbiome, mode of delivery, infant feeding type, solid food introduction, 16S rRNA gene profiling, fecal microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review