CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 136Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Specificity and multiplicity in the recognition of individuals: implications for the evolution of social behaviour

Wiley, R. H.·2013·Biological Reviews
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00246.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recognition of conspecifics occurs when individuals classify sets of conspecifics based on sensory input from them and associate these sets with different responses. Classification of conspecifics can vary in specificity (the number of individuals included in a set) and multiplicity (the number of sets differentiated). In other words, the information transmitted varies in complexity. Although recognition of conspecifics has been reported in a wide variety of organisms, few reports have addressed the specificity or multiplicity of this capability. This review discusses examples of these patterns, the mechanisms that can produce them, and the evolution of these mechanisms. Individual recognition is one end of a spectrum of specificity, and binary classification of conspecifics is one end of a spectrum of multiplicity. In some cases, recognition requires no more than simple forms of learning, such as habituation, yet results in individually specific recognition. In other cases, recognition of individuals involves complex associations of multiple cues with multiple previous experiences in particular contexts. Complex mechanisms for recognition are expected to evolve only when simpler mechanisms do not provide sufficient specificity and multiplicity to obtain the available advantages. In particular, the evolution of cooperation and deception is always promoted by specificity and multiplicity in recognition. Nevertheless, there is only one demonstration that recognition of specific individuals contributes to cooperation in animals other than primates. Human capacities for individual recognition probably have a central role in the evolution of complex forms of human cooperation and deception. Although relatively little studied, this capability probably rivals cognitive abilities for language.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00246.x

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 162 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hearst E., 1988, Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 3
  2. Lai W., 2004, Olfactory memory and individual recognition in golden hamsters, Hormones and Behavior, 46
  3. Richards D. G., 1979, Recognition of neighbors by associative learning in rufous‐sided towhees, Auk, 96, 688
  4. Schommer M. S., 1975, Lautäusserungen junger trottellummen (Uria a. aalge) als individuelle merkmale, Vogelwarte, 28, 17
  5. Stoddard P. K., 1996, Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, 356

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 136

Related

Metadata

Authors
Wiley, R. H.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Wiley, R. H.
ORCID
Wiley, R. H.
Venue
Biological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-14
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
179-195
ISSN
  • 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-7931
  • 1469-185X
DOI
10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00246.x
OpenAlex
W2031924082
Cited by
136
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
individual recognition, conspecific recognition, specificity, multiplicity, evolution of social behavior, cooperation, deception, habituation, learning, human cooperation, animal cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Humans, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review