The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys: Intraparietal sulcus in monkeys and humans, C. Grefkes and G. R. Fink
Open accessAbstract
In macaque monkeys, the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is concerned with the integration of multimodal information for constructing a spatial representation of the external world (in relation to the macaque's body or parts thereof), and planning and executing object-centred movements. The areas within the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), in particular, serve as interfaces between the perceptive and motor systems for controlling arm and eye movements in space. We review here the latest evidence for the existence of the IPS areas AIP (anterior intraparietal area), VIP (ventral intraparietal area), MIP (medial intraparietal area), LIP (lateral intraparietal area) and CIP (caudal intraparietal area) in macaques, and discuss putative human equivalents as assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. The data suggest that anterior parts of the IPS comprising areas AIP and VIP are relatively well preserved across species. By contrast, posterior areas such as area LIP and CIP have been found more medially in humans, possibly reflecting differences in the evolution of the dorsal visual stream and the inferior parietal lobule. Despite interspecies differences in the precise functional anatomy of the IPS areas, the functional relevance of this sulcus for visuomotor tasks comprising target selections for arm and eye movements, object manipulation and visuospatial attention is similar in humans and macaques, as is also suggested by studies of neurological deficits (apraxia, neglect, Bálint's syndrome) resulting from lesions to this region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Ungerleider, L. G. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,531
Ingle, D., Goodale, M. A., & Mansfield, R. J. W. (1982) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 4,118
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 1×
“The pioneering electrophysiological experiments by Mountcastle et al. (1975) demonstrated that the PPC contains quite different sets of neurons concerned with specific aspects of goal-directed arm and eye movements, for example reaching, grasping, fixation and rapid eye movements (saccades).”
BackgroundThe updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1553535 · Cited by 1,966
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22268 · Cited by 1,721
A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex
Zeki, S., Watson, J., Lueck, C., Friston, K., Kennard, C., & Frackowiak, R. (1991) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.11-03-00641.1991 · Cited by 1,716
Maunsell, J., & van Essen, D. (1983) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.03-12-02563.1983 · Cited by 1,602
A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements
Corbetta, M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Drury, H. A., Linenweber, M. R., Petersen, S. E., Raichle, M. E., Van Essen, D. C., et al. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80593-0 · Cited by 1,598
Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, complex cognitive functions such as decision processes, reward expectancy and perception of time have also been related to activity of LIP neurons (Platt & Glimcher, 1999; Roitman & Shadlen, 2002; Dickinson et al. 2003; Leon & Shadlen, 2003; Cohen et al. 2004).”
Background
Cited by
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060
Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans
Daw, N. D., O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04766 · Cited by 2,224
The Angular Gyrus: Multiple Functions and Multiple Subdivisions
Seghier, M. L. (2013) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858412440596 · Cited by 1,585
Mapping Human Cortical Areas In Vivo Based on Myelin Content as Revealed by T1- and T2-Weighted MRI
Glasser, M. F., & Van Essen, D. C. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2180-11.2011 · Cited by 1,447
ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain
Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112 · Cited by 1,386
Metadata
- Authors
- Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07-04
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-17
- ISSN
- 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152090685
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 15.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys: Intraparietal sulcus in monkeys and humans, C. Grefkes and G. R. Fink. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x
- The paper
- Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2005). REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys: Intraparietal sulcus in monkeys and humans, C. Grefkes and G. R. Fink. Journal of Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.