The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Culture of HepG2 liver cells on three dimensional polystyrene scaffolds enhances cell structure and function during toxicological challenge
Open accessAbstract
Cultured cells are dramatically affected by the micro‐environment in which they are grown. In this study, we have investigated whether HepG2 liver cells grown in three dimensional (3‐D) cultures cope more effectively with the known cytotoxic agent, methotrexate, than their counterparts grown on traditional two dimensional (2‐D) flat plastic surfaces. To enable 3‐D growth of HepG2 cells in vitro, we cultured cells on 3‐D porous polystyrene scaffolds previously developed in our laboratories. HepG2 cells grown in 3‐D displayed excellent morphological characteristics and formed numerous bile canaliculi that were seldom seen in cultures grown on 2‐D surfaces. The function of liver cells grown on 3‐D supports was significantly enhanced compared to activity of cells grown on 2‐D standard plasticware. Unlike their 2‐D counterparts, 3‐D cultures were less susceptible to lower concentrations of methotrexate. Cells grown in 3‐D maintained their structural integrity, possessed greater viability, were less susceptible to cell death at higher levels of the cytotoxin compared to 2‐D cultures, and appeared to respond to the drug in a manner more comparable to its known activity in vivo. Our results suggest that hepatotoxicity testing using 3‐D cultures might be more likely to reflect true physiological responses to cytotoxic compounds than existing models that rely on 2‐D culture systems. This technology has potential applications for toxicity testing and drug screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R., & Yamada, K. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064829 · Cited by 3,027
Weaver, V. M., Petersen, O. W., Wang, F., Larabell, C. A., Briand, P., Damsky, C., & Bissell, M. J. (1997) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.137.1.231 · Cited by 1,483
Bouma, M.-E., Rogier, E., Verthier, N., Labarre, C., & Feldmann, G. (1989) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1007/bf02628465 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture models in drug discovery and drug repositioning
Langhans, S. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00006 · Cited by 1,522
Godoy, P., Hewitt, N. J., Albrecht, U., Andersen, M. E., Ansari, N., Bhattacharya, S., Bode, J. G., Bolleyn, J., Borner, C., Böttger, J., et al. (2013) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1078-5 · Cited by 1,280
Self-citationA guide to the organ-on-a-chip
Leung, C. M., de Haan, P., Ronaldson-Bouchard, K., Kim, G.-A., Ko, J., Rho, H. S., Chen, Z., Habibovic, P., Jeon, N. L., Takayama, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6 · Cited by 1,116
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture: A Breakthrough in Vivo
Antoni, D., Burckel, H., Josset, E., & Noel, G. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16035517 · Cited by 990
Advances in 3D cell culture technologies enabling tissue‐like structures to be created in vitro
Knight, E., & Przyborski, S. (2015) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12257 · Cited by 530
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bokhari, M., Carnachan, R. J., Cameron, N. R., & Przyborski, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-15
- Volume
- 211
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 567-576
- ISSN
- 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7580
- OpenAlex
- W1993418575
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture of HepG2 liver cells on three dimensional polystyrene scaffolds enhances cell structure and function during toxicological challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00778.x
- The paper
- Bokhari, M., Carnachan, R. J., Cameron, N. R., & Przyborski, S. A. (2007). Culture of HepG2 liver cells on three dimensional polystyrene scaffolds enhances cell structure and function during toxicological challenge. Journal of Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00778.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.