Cited by 158Child Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The development of adopted children after institutional care: A follow-up study

Vorria, Panayiota, Papaligoura, Zaira, Sarafidou, Jasmin, Kopakaki, Maria, Dunn, Judy, Van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Kontopoulou, Antigoni·2006·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that institutional care has long-lasting effects on children. However, no study has longitudinally studied infants in an institution and their subsequent development at age four. METHODS: Sixty-one adopted children aged four years who had spent their first two years of life in an institution were compared to 39 children reared in their own two-parent families. Cognitive development, security of attachment, shyness, children's emotional understanding and behavioural problems were examined in both groups. Parental health and stress were also assessed. RESULTS: At four years adopted children still had lower scores on cognitive development, were less secure, and less able to understand emotions than family-reared children. Children with a secure attachment type in infancy were found to be less secure at age four, compared with those who were classified in infancy as having an insecure attachment type. Their physical development had recovered, they were less shy, had no behavioural problems and no problems in the relationship with their teacher. CONCLUSIONS: Early residential group care has long-lasting effects on important socio-emotional and cognitive aspects of preschool children's development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01666.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vorria, P., Papaligoura, Z., Sarafidou, J., Kopakaki, M., Dunn, J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Kontopoulou, A.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Institute of Child Health (GR)
Corresponding author
Vorria, Panayiota
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-27
Volume
47
Issue
12
Pages
1246-1253
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1969713318
Cited by
158
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nuffield Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
institutional care, adoption, adopted children, cognitive development, attachment security, shyness, emotional understanding, behavioral problems, parental stress, preschool children
MeSH terms
Adoption, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Infant, Institutionalization, Language Development, Male, Object Attachment, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review