The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using computerized games to teach face recognition skills to children with autism spectrum disorder: the Let’s Face It! program
Open accessAbstract
Background: An emerging body of evidence indicates that relative to typically developing children, children with autism are selectively impaired in their ability to recognize facial identity. A critical question is whether face recognition skills can be enhanced through a direct training intervention. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder were pre‐screened with a battery of subtests (the Let’s Face It! Skills battery) examining face and object processing abilities. Participants who were significantly impaired in their face processing abilities were assigned to either a treatment or a waitlist group. Children in the treatment group ( N = 42) received 20 hours of face training with the Let’s Face It! ( LFI! ) computer‐based intervention. The LFI! program is comprised of seven interactive computer games that target the specific face impairments associated with autism, including the recognition of identity across image changes in expression, viewpoint and features, analytic and holistic face processing strategies and attention to information in the eye region. Time 1 and Time 2 performance for the treatment and waitlist groups was assessed with the Let’s Face It! Skills battery. Results: The main finding was that relative to the control group ( N = 37), children in the face training group demonstrated reliable improvements in their analytic recognition of mouth features and holistic recognition of a face based on its eyes features. Conclusion: These results indicate that a relatively short‐term intervention program can produce measurable improvements in the face recognition skills of children with autism. As a treatment for face processing deficits, the Let’s Face It! program has advantages of being cost‐free, adaptable to the specific learning needs of the individual child and suitable for home and school applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Five studies reported adequate random sequence generation (34, 59, 60, 62, 63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Eight studies used serious games that were designed as such (34, 35, 58–63). Two studies used an existing entertainment game for a serious purpose (purpose-shifted) (48, 64).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Six studies used serious games in the cognition training genre (48, 58, 59, 61, 63, 65).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Beaumont and Sofronoff (35) and Tanaka et al. (63) had facial expression as common primary outcome measure.”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“The cognition training game Let’s Face It! was used in order to reduce ASD-related symptoms such as poor facial recognition skills (63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“The intervention had a duration of 19.1 weeks average (63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Two studies used serious games to address symptoms of ASD (35, 63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Let’s Face It! used face subtests (face dimensions, immediate memory for faces, matching identity, masked features, expression, and parts/whole identity) and object subtests (house dimensions and immediate memory for cars) (63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“The games of Tanaka et al. (63) are based on the theory of enhancement of recognition skills (63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“ASD was the focus of two studies (35, 63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Four studies had a high likelihood of incomplete outcome data (35, 58, 60, 63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Excluding the study with the highest (34) and lowest (63) effect size showed similar results (see Table 3).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“The group that aimed at ASD-related symptoms such as lowered ability of recognition skills (35, 63) was shown to have a moderate non-significant (P > 0.05) effect size [g = 0.46 (95% CI 0.10–0.81, NNT = 3.91)].”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“The group targeting youth (≤18) (34, 35, 59–61, 63) was shown to have a moderate effect size [g = 0.70 (95% CI 0.32–1.07, NNT = 2.63)]”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“The group targeting clinical participants (with diagnosed mental disorder) (35, 59, 61, 63) showed a moderate effect size of [g = 0.59 (95% CI 0.18–0.99, NNT = 3.09)]”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“The majority of studies focused on youth and young adults especially for ASD, ADHD, and depression (34, 35, 59–61, 63).”
From Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,546
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Wechsler, D. (1999) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15170-000 · Cited by 4,681
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III
Ryan, J. J., & Lopez, S. J. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1185-4_2 · Cited by 3,680
Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749308401045 · Cited by 2,179
Self-citationEnhanced Perceptual Functioning in Autism: An Update, and Eight Principles of Autistic Perception
Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulières, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0040-7 · Cited by 1,957
Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised
Rutter, M., LeCouteur, A., & Lord, C. (2016) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t18128-000 · Cited by 1,627
Schultz, R. T. (2005) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.012 · Cited by 1,071
Self-citationBecoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition
Gauthier, L., & Tarr, M. J. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00286-6 · Cited by 1,017
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
Mussey, J. L. (2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483392271.n535 · Cited by 689
GOLAN, O., & BARON-COHEN, S. (2006) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579406060305 · Cited by 645
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–315 of 315
Emotional Face Recognition Training on Parental Competence in Children with Autism
Mirzaei, F., Cheraghi, F., Khazaei, S., Rezaei, M., Seyedi, M., & Mohammadi, F. (2022) · Pajouhan Scientific Journal · doi:10.61186/psj.20.2.95
Unveiling Insights: Analyzing Application Logs to Enhance Autism Therapy Outcomes
Ilijoski, B., & Ackovska, N. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54321-0_8
Moradi, V., Sohrabi, S., Ghaleno, H. R., & Haghani, S. (2023) · Iran Journal of Nursing · doi:10.32598/ijn.36.144.3331
Liverani, M. C., Siffredi, V., Mikneviciute, G., Mazza, E., Leuchter, R. H., Hüppi, P. S., Tolsa, C. B., & Gentaz, É. (2024) · Children · doi:10.3390/children11080956
Technologies for Intervention in Autism: Current Knowledge and Research Framework
Gutiérrez, G. H., & Vera, L. (2024) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76414-1_1
GÖKÇE, A. P., & Pekcan, A. G. (2025) · Journal of Surgery and Medicine · doi:10.28982/josam.8161
Cai, D., Cai, M., Cai, X., Wang, M., & Zou, Q. (2025) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2025.2525936
Leo, N. D., Rossi, M., Musicco, A. T., & Toto, G. A. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93999-0_4
Can training improve face recognition in typical, autistic, and prosopagnosic individuals?
Davies-Thompson, J., Tree, J. J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191986802.003.0007
Hamid, S., Hoque, T. U., Bahaj, B., & Mohiuddin, R. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.102030 · Cited by 1
Autism Spectrum Condition: An Update on its Understanding and Clinical Perspective
Prasad, S., Kisku, S., & Gupta, R. S. A. S. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1010055
Marcilla-Jordá, M., Montañés-Martí, S., Rubio‐Belmonte, C., & Ipola, M. M. (2026) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.reia.2026.202866
Zhu, Y., & Su, X. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16081340
Hu, W., Huang, M., Yuan, Y., & Luo, R. (2026) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-026-10088-2
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanaka, J. W., Wolf, J. M., Klaiman, C., Koenig, K., Cockburn, J., Herlihy, L., Brown, C., Stahl, S., Kaiser, M. D., & Schultz, R. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Yale University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 944-952
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W2109068575
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0542013)
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- University of Victoria
- National Institutes of Health (SBE-0542013)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD046526)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, face recognition (cognition), computer-based intervention, interactive computer games, facial expression recognition, children
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Discrimination Learning, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Masking, Retention, Psychology, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Video Games, Asperger Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
