Cited by 645Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Systemizing empathy: Teaching adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism to recognize complex emotions using interactive multimedia

GOLAN, OFER, BARON-COHEN, SIMON·2006·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

This study evaluated Mind Reading , an interactive systematic guide to emotions, for its effectiveness in teaching adults with Asperger syndrome (AS) and high-functioning autism (HFA) to recognize complex emotions in faces and voices. Experiment 1 tested a group of adults diagnosed with AS/HFA ( n = 19) who used the software at home for 10–15 weeks. Participants were tested on recognition of faces and voices at three different levels of generalization. A matched control group of adults with AS/HFA ( n = 22) were assessed without any intervention. In addition, a third group of general population controls ( n = 24) was tested. Experiment 2 repeated the design of Experiment 1 with a group of adults with AS/HFA who used the software at home and met in a group with a tutor on a weekly basis. They were matched to a control group of adults with AS/HFA attending social skills training and to a general population control group ( n = 13 for all three groups). In both experiments the intervention group improved significantly more than the control group on close, but not distant, generalization tasks. Verbal IQ had significant effects in Experiment 2. Using Mind Reading for a relatively short period of time allows users to learn to recognize a variety of complex emotions and mental states. However, additional methods are required to enhance generalization. The first author was supported by the National Alliance for Autism Research, the Corob Charitable Trust, the Cambridge Overseas Trust and B'nai B'rith Leo Baeck scholarships. The second author was supported by the Shirley Foundation, the Medical Research Council, and the Three Guineas Trust. We are grateful to the following for helping with this study: our participants, Red Green and Blue Ltd, Jessica Kingsley Ltd, Pamela Yates for arranging and running the social skills groups, Andrea Macleod and Rob Whiskens (Autism West Midlands), Jill Howard (Autism London), Lynne Moxon (European Services for People with Autism), and Harriet Fisher and James Graham (The Interact Centre). Many thanks to Jacqueline Hill, Chris Ashwin, Sally Wheelwright, Matthew Belmonte, Yael Golan, Sarah Johnson, Emma Chapman, and Ilaria Minio Paluello. A version of this work was presented at the International Meeting For Autism Research (IMFAR), May 2004.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579406060305

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions teaching people with ASD to recognize emotions from simplified stimuli often improve performance on simplified tasks but not in real-world social interactions.

    “Further, performance on simplified social cognitive tasks does not always track with the severity of social deficits in ASD (37, 38), and interventions teaching people with ASD to recognize emotions from simplified stimuli often improve performance on simplified tasks but not in real-world social interactions (39, 40).”

    From The neural bases of empathic accuracy (2009) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOLAN, O., & BARON-COHEN, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Cambridge
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2006-03-28
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
591-617
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2166103206
Cited by
645
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 38
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, high-functioning autism, emotion recognition, facial emotion recognition, voice emotion recognition, interactive multimedia, empathy, generalization, social skills training, verbal IQ, autistic adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Educational Status, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Software, Teaching, Multimedia, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review