Cited by 190Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Investigation of cool and hot executive function in ODD/CD independently of ADHD

Open access
Hobson, Christopher W., Scott, Stephen, Rubia, Katya·2011·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder (ODD/CD) have shown deficits in 'cool' abstract-cognitive, and 'hot' reward-related executive function (EF) tasks. However, it is currently unclear to what extent ODD/CD is associated with neuropsychological deficits, independently of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Fifty-nine adolescents with a history of early-onset oppositional problems, 28 with pure ODD/CD symptoms and 31 with ADHD with or without ODD/CD, and 34 healthy controls were administered a task battery measuring motor response inhibition, sustained attention, cognitive flexibility and reward-related decision-making. Findings were analysed using dimensional and group analyses. RESULTS: In group analyses both groups with and without ADHD were impaired in EF measures. Dimensional analyses, however, showed that ODD/CD but not ADHD was related to hot EF based on increased risky decision-making in the Iowa Gambling Task. ODD/CD was also independently related to aspects of cool EF independently of ADHD, namely slower speeds of inhibitory responding and increased intra-subject variability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show EF deficits associated with ODD/CD independently of ADHD, and implicate reward-related abnormalities in theories of antisocial behaviour development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02454.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hobson et al. found that adolescents with ADHD made more risky choices than NCs on the second phase of the IGT (Cohen's d = 0.69).

    “Hobson et al. [49] examined the performance of adolescents with ADHD on the second phase of the IGT, i.e. the risky decision-making phase in which the participants have some abstract knowledge of the riskiness of their choices (see the description in the introduction), and also found that individuals with ADHD made more risky choices than the NCs (Cohen’s d = 0.69).”
  • In dimensional analyses, ODD/CD symptoms but not ADHD symptoms were associated with risky behavior on the IGT.

    “Additionally dimensional analyses (multiple regression analyses) revealed that ODD/CD but not ADHD symptoms were associated with risky behavior on the IGT.”
  • Adolescents with ADHD displayed more risky behavior on the IGT than NCs.

    “Hobson et al. [49] found that adolescents with ADHD displayed more risky behavior in the IGT than NCs.”
  • Ten studies used an implicit gambling task, of which five (50%) found clear evidence that children/adolescents with ADHD displayed more risky behavior than NCs.

    “Ten studies used an implicit gambling task, of which five studies (5/10 = 50%) found clear evidence that children/adolescents with ADHD displayed more risky behavior than NCs [35], [47], [49], [53], [55].”
  • Ten additional studies could not be considered in the discussion of ADHD subtypes because no information was provided about participants' ADHD subtypes.

    “The findings of ten additional studies could not be taken into consideration in this discussion, since no information was provided about the participants’ subtypes of ADHD”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Angold, A., Costello, E.J., & Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 57-87.
  2. Scott, S., Spender, Q., Doolan, M., Jacobs, B., & Aspland, H. (2001). Multicentre controlled trail of parenting groups for child antisocial behaviour in clinical practice. British Med- ical Journal, 323, 194-197.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobson, C. W., Scott, S., & Rubia, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-09
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
1035-1043
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1537468674
Cited by
190
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, executive function, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, risky decision making, Iowa Gambling Task, sustained attention, cognitive flexibility, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Social Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review