Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 670

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure

Open access
Knot, Harm J., Nelson, Mark T.·1998·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The regulation of intracellular [Ca 2+] in the smooth muscle cells in the wall of small pressurized cerebral arteries (100‐200 μm) of rat was studied using simultaneous digital fluorescence video imaging of arterial diameter and wall [Ca 2+], combined with microelectrode measurements of arterial membrane potential. Elevation of intravascular pressure (from 10 to 100 mmHg) caused a membrane depolarization from ‐63 ± 1 to ‐36 ± 2 mV, increased arterial wall [Ca 2+] from 119 ± 10 to 245 ± 9 nM, and constricted the arteries from 208 ± 10 μm (fully dilated, Ca 2+free) to 116 ± 7 μm or by 45 % (‘myogenic tone’). Pressure‐induced increases in arterial wall [Ca 2+] and vasoconstriction were blocked by inhibitors of voltage‐dependent Ca 2+channels (diltiazem and nisoldipine) or to the same extent by removal of external Ca 2+. At a steady pressure (i.e. under isobaric conditions at 60 mmHg), the membrane potential was stable at ‐45 ± 1 mV, intracellular [Ca 2+] was 190 ± 10 nM, and arteries were constricted by 41 % (to 115 ± 7 μm from 196 ± 8 μm fully dilated). Under this condition of ‐45 ± 5 mV at 60 mmHg, the voltage sensitivity of wall [Ca 2+] and diameter were 7.5 nM mV−1 and 7.5 μm mV−1, respectively, resulting in a Ca 2+sensitivity of diameter of 1 μm nM−1. Membrane potential depolarization from ‐58 to ‐23 mV caused pressurized arteries (to 60 mmHg) to constrict over their entire working range, i.e. from maximally dilated to constricted. This depolarization was associated with an elevation of arterial wall [Ca 2+] from 124 ± 7 to 347 ± 12 nM. These increases in arterial wall [Ca 2+] and vasoconstriction were blocked by L‐type voltage‐dependent Ca 2+channel inhibitors. The relationship between arterial wall [Ca 2+] and membrane potential was not significantly different under isobaric (60 mmHg) and non‐isobaric conditions (10‐100 mmHg), suggesting that intravascular pressure regulates arterial wall [Ca 2+] through changes in membrane potential. The results are consistent with the idea that intravascular pressure causes membrane potential depolarization, which opens voltage‐dependent Ca 2+channels, acting as ‘voltage sensors’, thus increasing Ca 2+entry and arterial wall [Ca 2+], which leads to vasoconstriction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.199br.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 670

Metadata

Authors
Knot, H. J., & Nelson, M. T.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-04
Volume
508
Issue
1
Pages
199-209
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2156600279
Cited by
670
References
0
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.199br.x
The paper
Knot, H. J., & Nelson, M. T. (1998). Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.199br.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.