The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct frequency preferences of different types of rat hippocampal neurones in response to oscillatory input currents
Open accessAbstract
1. Coherent network oscillations in several distinct frequency bands are seen in the hippocampus of behaving animals. To investigate how different neuronal types within this network respond to oscillatory inputs we made whole-cell current clamp recordings from three different types of neurones in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices: pyramidal cells, fast-spiking interneurones and horizontal interneurones, and recorded their response to sinusoidal inputs at physiologically relevant frequencies (1-100 Hz). 2. Pyramidal neurones showed firing preference to inputs at theta frequencies (range 2-7 Hz; n = 30). They showed subthreshold resonance in the same frequency range (2-7 Hz; mean 4.1 +/- 0.4 Hz; n = 19). 3. Interneurones differed in their firing properties. Horizontal interneurones in the stratum oriens showed firing preference to inputs at theta frequencies (range 1.5-10 Hz; n = 10). These interneurones also showed resonance at low frequencies (range 1-5 Hz; mean 2.4 +/- 0.5 Hz; n = 7). In contrast, fast-spiking interneurones with cell bodies in the pyramidal cell layer fired preferentially at input frequencies in the gamma band (range 30-50 Hz; n = 10/12). These interneurones showed resonance at beta-gamma frequencies (10-50 Hz; mean 26 +/- 5 Hz; n = 7/8). 4. Thus, in the hippocampus, different types of neurones have distinct frequency preferences. Therefore, in the CA1 layer of the hippocampal network, a compound oscillatory input may be segregated into distinct frequency components which are processed locally by distinct types of neurones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain
Steriade, M., McCormick, D. A., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8235588 · Cited by 3,564
Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning
Singer, W. (1993) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002025 · Cited by 1,685
Whittington, M. A., Traub, R. D., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373612a0 · Cited by 1,613
Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat
Bragin, A., Jando, G., Nadasdy, Z., Hetke, J., Wise, K., & Buzsaki, G. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00047.1995 · Cited by 1,527
Synchronization of neuronal activity in hippocampus by individual GABAergic interneurons
Cobb, S. R., Buhl, E. H., Halasy, K., Paulsen, O., & Somogyi, P. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378075a0 · Cited by 1,498
Self-citationCholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40 Hz in the hippocampus in vitro
Fisahn, A., Pike, F. G., Buhl, E. H., & Paulsen, O. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28179 · Cited by 884
Self-citationBuhl, E. H., Halasy, K., & Somogyi, P. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368823a0 · Cited by 728
Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation
Kahana, M. J., Sekuler, R., Caplan, J. B., Kirschen, M., & Madsen, J. R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21645 · Cited by 649
Blasco‐Ibáñez, J. M., & Freund, T. F. (1995) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00638.x · Cited by 212
Cited by
The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A., & Koch, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3241 · Cited by 4,225
Mechanisms of Gamma Oscillations
Buzsáki, G., & Wang, X.-J. (2012) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444 · Cited by 2,796
Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks
Bartos, M., Vida, I., & Jonas, P. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2044 · Cited by 2,070
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex
The Petilla Interneuron Nomenclature Group (PING) (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2402 · Cited by 1,491
Metadata
- Authors
- Pike, F. G., Goddard, R. S., Suckling, J. M., Ganter, P., Kasthuri, N., & Paulsen, O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 529
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-213
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2023925279
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct frequency preferences of different types of rat hippocampal neurones in response to oscillatory input currents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00205.x
- The paper
- Pike, F. G., Goddard, R. S., Suckling, J. M., Ganter, P., Kasthuri, N., & Paulsen, O. (2000). Distinct frequency preferences of different types of rat hippocampal neurones in response to oscillatory input currents. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00205.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.