Cited by 77Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Behavioural response of wild rodents to the calls of an owl: a comparative study

Open access
Hendrie, Colin A., Weiss, Scott M., Eilam, David·1998·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Effective anti‐predator defence mechanisms depend on efficient recognition of possible predators. However, nocturnal aerial predators, such as owls, present very few stimuli to enable their detection by potential prey. The most prominent of these are their territorial calls which are believed to provide sufficient stimuli to activate anti‐predator defence mechanisms in species heavily predated upon by owls. To test this hypothesis, the behaviour of voles (Microtus socialis), dormice (Eliomys melanurus), jerboas (Jaculus jaculus), and spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) was analysed during and following exposure to playback of tape recorded calls of the tawny owl (Strix aluco). In response, voles crouched, and retreated to a small burrow present in the test arena; dormice also reduced the distances they travelled in the arena, and spent an increased amount of time around the burrow; jerboas crouched and froze during the playback of the owl call but not thereafter; spiny mice, however, displayed enigmatic behaviour in apparently ignoring the owl calls. The results, which demonstrate an induction of defensive behaviours to recorded owl calls, support the results of others who have examined the effects of exposing wild rodents to live owls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00118.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rats, ultrasonic vocalizations at 22 kHz constitute alarm calls used in the face of threat, and they are produced only in the presence of conspecifics.

    “For instance, it has been shown that in rats ultrasonic vocalizations at 22 kHz constitute the alarm calls used in the face of threat.Importantly, they are produced only in the presence of conspecifics.162,163”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendrie, C. A., Weiss, S. M., & Eilam, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Eilam, David
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-08
Volume
245
Issue
4
Pages
439-446
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2134038742
Cited by
77
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tel Aviv University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
tawny owl, Strix aluco, antipredator behavior, predator detection, voles, dormice, jerboa, spiny mouse, playback experiments, defensive behavior, burrowing behavior, freezing response, rodent predation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review