The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about interactions between the critically endangered Sumatran tiger Panthera tigris sumatrae and its prey because of the difficulties associated with detecting these species. In this study, we quantify temporal overlap between the Sumatran tiger and five of its presumed prey species from four study areas comprising disturbed lowland to primary submontane forest. Data from 126 camera traps over 8984 camera days were used to estimate species activity patterns and, in turn, their overlap through the coefficient Δ (ranging from 0 to 1, i.e. no overlap to complete overlap). A newly developed statistical technique was applied to determine confidence intervals associated with respective overlap, which is important, as such measures of precision are usually not estimated in these types of study. Strong temporal overlap was found between tiger and muntjac Muntiacus muntjac (Δ=0.80, 95%CI=0.71–0.84) and tiger and sambar Cervus unicolor (Δ=0.81, 0.55–0.85), with the latter illustrating the importance of measuring precision. According to the foraging theory, Sumatran tigers should focus on expending lower levels of energy searching for and then capturing larger bodied prey that present the least risk. Hence, surprisingly, there was little overlap between the crepuscular tiger and the largest-bodied prey species available, the nocturnal tapir Tapirus indicus (0.52, 0.44–0.60), suggesting that it is not a principal prey species. This study provides the first insights into Sumatran tiger–prey temporal interactions. The ability to estimate overlap statistics with measures of precision has obvious and wide benefits for other predator–prey and interspecific competition studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data
Ridout, M. S., & Linkie, M. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1198/jabes.2009.08038 · Cited by 1,492
Self-citationThe Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions
Brown, J. S., Laundre, J. W., & Gurung, M. (1999) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1383287 · Cited by 1,347
Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,176
Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape
O'Brien, T. G., Kinnaird, M. F., & Wibisono, H. T. (2003) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1017/s1367943003003172 · Cited by 1,114
Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk
Creel, S., Christianson, D., Liley, S., & Winnie, J. A. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135918 · Cited by 666
Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests
Karanth, K. U., & Sunquist, M. E. (1995) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5647 · Cited by 661
Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1987) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691206790 · Cited by 606
ASSESSING EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK ON FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF MULE DEER
Altendorf, K. B., Laundré, J. W., López González, C. A., & Brown, J. S. (2001) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0430:aeopro>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 377
Carbone, C., Teacher, A., & Rowcliffe, J. M. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050022 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Wang, Y., Allen, M. L., & Wilmers, C. C. (2015) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.007 · Cited by 320
Schuette, P., Wagner, A. P., Wagner, M. E., & Creel, S. (2013) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.008 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Linkie, M., & Ridout, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-09
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 224-229
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W1723755862
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00801.x
- The paper
- Linkie, M., & Ridout, M. S. (2011). Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests. Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00801.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.